LogFAQs > #978801411

Katanablade posted...

If Procon.org is not even addressing the holocaust, and is not allowing any stances on the subject that defend it, why do we even have to address it?.

And Antiyonder, i am not interested in having any debates with you on what subjects Procon.org is addressing and saying, thats not the reason i mentioned it. Im not being a spokes person for what other people have said

The point is to demonstrate that website is presenting bigotry and harmful content as if it should be allowed a seat at the table as a valid viewpoint. It implicitly affords legitimacy to hate while claiming to be neutral and nonpartisan.

On the topic of gay marriage, another facet is that there was no forcing anyone to engage in gay marriage. When people have religious objections to it, they are free to abstain from gay marriage. That doesn't mean they get to impose their religious belief on the rest of the country. The context of how those debate points are presented does not take any of that into account. It's not promoting critical thinking.