LogFAQs > #978807339

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWhats the point of discussing any politics?
EPR-radar
02/12/24 4:32:22 PM
#170:


Antiyonder posted...
I don't know. I'd say any person who voices opposition to LGBTQ+ rights on religious ground need to agree to a test to prove they practice what they preach, constantly before their voice can be given platform.

Refusal means rejection and any signs of the slightest vice (Again movie/show/book with even the slightest bit of profanity).

I don't know. Is there any case where it's morally acceptable to limit what others do/gain based on religion while granting yourself many exceptions?
Person A forcing person B to live by the standards of person A's religion is bullshit, whether or not person A is a hypocrite.

---
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1