LogFAQs > #979265877

Skyscraper101 posted...

It is more I don't understand how you would wash your dick but not wash your foreskin. Nobody "taught" me how to wash my foreskin. When I had the intelligence to start washing myself, I didn't stare at my foreskin in bewilderment. I washed it just the same as I did the rest of my dick, my ballsack, my armpits, my butt. I didn't wash my dick then STOP at my foreskin in fear of what it might be. Just like if you washed your ears you wouldn't just randomly stop at washing your earlobes, and I bet nobody in the history of this planet has ever been fine with washing their ears and then start bitching about how fucking annoying and difficult it is to wash their earlobes.

My point is a person who doesn't wash their foreskin is actually just a person who doesn't wash their dick. Nothing to do with foreskin.

I mean. If you washed your dick and didnt pull the foreskin back and wash under it, (I know its not really under but you know what I mean), then youre not really washing it. Whereas that extra bit of attention isnt necessary when youre circumcised.

its a fact that not every human being naturally knows how to wash every part of their body, I dunno what to tell you there. Its also a fact men exist that dont wash their dicks correctly, including the main issue being not washing their uncircumcised dick correctly. My strongest source there is that I know women who have complained of this very issue with uncircumcised men.

but also there is the literal existence of the word Smegma. A word which refers to buildup under the foreskin that doesnt exist in circumcised men.

so let me put it another way: Ive literally never had to clean smegma and Im happy that way.