LogFAQs > #979265945

Zonbei posted...

Havent done that once. Ive said circumcision can lower the incidence of STI spread as compared to non circumcised people. This doesnt necessarily make any given rate lower than any given other rate geographically, because there are other factors.

basically, 100-2= 98. 10-1= 8. The 2 there is still the larger subtraction even though the final number is bigger. I dont understand why Im having to explain basic math.

You know theres these things called condoms that also prevent stis? Still doesn't change the fact that those benefits do not outweigh cutting something off a baby because there's a slight chance to prevent sti transmissions. Don't want a sti or hiv? Wear a condom. They fit on cut and uncut guys. Like I said how about we give the kid his choice instead of arbitrarily taking it away from him because of the stupid bs of "its cleaner, it's easier to wash, etc." Stop cutting your fucking kids. Cool your cut and your happy with it. Doesn't mean others would be.