| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | To circumcise or not? |
| Zonbei 03/09/24 10:40:09 PM #428: | KI_Simpson posted...
Imposing a permanent cosmetic change on someone because you like how it looks better is absolutely not standard practice in medicine, at least not anywhere at least pretending to be ethical. The "benefits" are microscopic and come from biased sources, it is very clearly done out of tradition or cosmetic preference. I have never once said you should do it because you like how it looks better. Thats the other guy, who I disagree with. Your claim that the benefits are microscopic and come from biased sources is what the ENTIRE REST OF THIS TOPIC has been about. The first claim is a determination youve made. The benefits are minor. The downsides are even more minor. Microscopic is a word youre using to downplay the benefits. the biased sources thing has been pretty soundly disproved, which is why the people claiming it shut up about it and moved on to the next stupid claim. Or in the case of the guy talking about Kellog, stopped responding entirely because they got roundly embarrassed by how wrong they were after spending the entire topic claiming something the exact opposite of reality. --- It's a luscious mix of words and tricks, that let us bet, when we know we should have folded. ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |