LogFAQs > #979285586

Zonbei posted...

I have never once said you should do it because you like how it looks better. Thats the other guy, who I disagree with.

Your claim that the benefits are microscopic and come from biased sources is what the ENTIRE REST OF THIS TOPIC has been about. The first claim is a determination youve made. The benefits are minor. The downsides are even more minor. Microscopic is a word youre using to downplay the benefits.

the biased sources thing has been pretty soundly disproved, which is why the people claiming it shut up about it and moved on to the next stupid claim. Or in the case of the guy talking about Kellog, stopped responding entirely because they got roundly embarrassed by how wrong they were after spending the entire topic claiming something the exact opposite of reality.

The downsides are not minor, we have either people's autonomy being taken away and then being shamed if they object to it or people who aren't circumcised being told they're repulsive because their penis looking like it naturally does is wrong and something their partners have a right to demand be altered. Whether you personally do those things or not, they happen entirely because of nonconsensual circumcisions. I didn't read all of the 400 posts before I entered the conversation, but I saw nothing proving their were non-microscopic benefits from unbiased sources, feel free to repost the best ones if you think there are.