LogFAQs > #979286609

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTo circumcise or not?
Zonbei
03/10/24 12:13:43 AM
#456:


Enclave posted...
If you're going to be literally removing a part of a persons body without consent you better have a damn good reason for it. You seem to just try to scattershot for literally any possible excuse you can reach for that's clearly not actually a real problem. It's like you're just looking for any possible excuse to justify an unjustifiable position.


The projection here is insane. You literally invented that I claimed circumcision solved major problems, then tried to use the lack of the existence of major problems as a reason I was wrong.

Theres no scattershot; Ive been pretty clear this entire fucking time that it has the minor benefits of lowering STI and penile cancer occurence. I was reminded of phimosis and other rare issues caused by having a foreskin, because someone else brought it up. Thats it. Thats the entirety of my points. So scattershot, clearly.

---
It's a luscious mix of words and tricks, that let us bet, when we know we should have folded.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1