LogFAQs > #979291098

hockeybabe89 posted...

It does. You might not think so, but you're retroactively trying to justify circumcision. It is only acceptable in the US because of religion. It never would have become normalized otherwise and that is a fact. Don't try to use logic to justify what was established illogically.

As Ive already explained, the only reason it was even religious to begin with was health reasons, like many other religious laws.

also, it was doctors that began saying it was useful in the US, not churches.

I dont need to retroactively justify anything. I have laid out my stance very clearly, and its rational, whether you agree with it or not. Theres no illogic here.