LogFAQs > #980236871

Last time I shared content that shows how the Cass Report is harmful, it was shot down with the same bogus hand waving as a biased source even though it was from a highly respected journalist for trans issues (Erin Reed.)

There's a ton of problems with the report and it is not helpful, following a pattern of treating gender affirming care as unproven and experimental because they want to throw out evidence and research. It's a dogmatic and harmful approach and way behind. I would bet dollars to donuts Hilary Cass was intentionally chosen for her views on providing gender affirming care to minors, and she went about crafting this review accordingly.

Her methodology has already been deconstructed as deeply unethical.