LogFAQs > #980313009

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	James Gunn's thoughts on Batman 89
RetuenOfDevsman 05/09/24 8:18:10 AM #52:	vycebrand2 posted... 89 Gotham looks like a fake city. It's why I like the Bale Gotham. 89 Gotham borrows alot from the 40's and 50's being set then might work better. It looks like a fake city because it IS a fake city. There is no real Gotham. These are just sets. What they got right about it, though, was the architecture, dirtiness and overall tone. It's actually one of my criticisms of the Nolan films. Though I much preferred them overall to every other Batman films, in 2 and 3 Gotham was just Chicago. --- There's a difference between canon and not-stupid. <cite>RetuenOfDevsman posted [p:980313009] in James Gunn... [t:80762843]...</cite> <quote>vycebrand2 posted... </cite><quote>89 Gotham looks like a fake city. It's why I like the Bale Gotham. 89 Gotham borrows alot from the 40's and 50's being set then might work better.</quote>It looks like a fake city because it IS a fake city. There is no real Gotham. These are just sets.What they got right about it, though, was the architecture, dirtiness and overall tone.It's actually one of my criticisms of the Nolan films. Though I much preferred them overall to every other Batman films, in 2 and 3 Gotham was just Chicago. --- There's a difference between canon and not-stupid.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1