| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Musk:too many giant corps. own game studios, so he wants to...make a game studio |
| shadowsword87 12/03/24 10:37:30 PM #73: | adjl posted... Sure you can. The specifics of "X happens after pushing a third button and then Y happens and then you can choose to make Z happen by pressing a fourth button" form the actual legal nuance of any given claim, and you need every single one of those words to pass an actual legal judgement, but you can absolutely summarize at least the broad concept of what the patent is meant to cover. I'm not looking for a full legal opinion on the extent of the patents, I'm just wondering what ideas they're focusing on. Which is those three patents that are posted. You're free to read under the broadest reasonable interpretation, and could even act as one skilled in the art. By defining, and simplifying it, you're putting all independent and dependent claims in a box with your own biases and interpretation, which could just be wrong. The patents are complicated and rough to read, but it's still possible. You could read the abstract and make a judgement call, but I wouldn't recommend telling a judge or an attorney that. willythemailboy posted... The short version is "aiming a character at a NPC in a specific area, throwing an object to capture that NPC, being able to improve the odds of a successful capture by weakening the NPC, and being able to release that captured NPC to fight other NPCs at a later time". There are three patents that are you trying to summarize, could you be more specific? ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |