LogFAQs > #876197777

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	2013 Character Battle X-Stats: The Adjusted Version (now with less Draven)
red sox 777 03/30/17 3:39:10 PM #36:	LeonhartFour posted... pjbasis posted... With the right bracket placement he could win a match! Or at least secure a solid 2nd place win. second place is not a win in three-ways you still get eliminated red sox 777 posted... any set of adjusted stats becomes more the opinions of its author than anything else. Not really. Unless you're making arbitrary adjustments based on nothing, there's at least some data behind it. Some data can have multiple interpretations, just like any form of statistics. I agree that Mario probably isn't as strong as KP's stats suggest though. I'd adjust him based on the Crono match rather than the 2010 X-Stats because I feel like 2010 Mario wins despite the LFF. We have so much data now that almost anything can be supported by some data. And with the sparseness of 1v1 matches relative to multi-way matches, we have a lot of characters who can be adjusted in many different ways. I don't mean that a user's opinions are wrong or don't have value, but my guess is everyone creating a list of adjusted stats will come up with something quite different. It's not like 2003 where cn's unadjusted list added a lot of value, and then 2003/4 when there was little controversy about the first adjusted list. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! <cite>red sox 777 posted [p:876197777] in 2013 Chara... [t:75174781]...</cite> <quote><cite>LeonhartFour posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pjbasis posted...</cite> <quote>With the right bracket placement he could win a match! Or at least secure a solid 2nd place win. </quote> second place is not a win in three-ways you still get eliminated <cite>red sox 777 posted...</cite> <quote>any set of adjusted stats becomes more the opinions of its author than anything else.</quote> Not really. Unless you're making arbitrary adjustments based on nothing, there's at least some data behind it. Some data can have multiple interpretations, just like any form of statistics. I agree that Mario probably isn't as strong as KP's stats suggest though. I'd adjust him based on the Crono match rather than the 2010 X-Stats because I feel like 2010 Mario wins despite the LFF.</quote> We have so much data now that almost anything can be supported by some data. And with the sparseness of 1v1 matches relative to multi-way matches, we have a lot of characters who can be adjusted in many different ways. I don't mean that a user's opinions are wrong or don't have value, but my guess is everyone creating a list of adjusted stats will come up with something quite different. It's not like 2003 where cn's unadjusted list added a lot of value, and then 2003/4 when there was little controversy about the first adjusted list. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1