LogFAQs > #877575685

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDoctor acquitted of neglilgence after accidentially slicing off a boys penis.
LightHawKnight
04/20/17 3:47:30 PM
#10:


Sir Will posted...
Total bullshit. Circumcision in general and the taking of the photos but more relevant:

UnfairRepresent posted...
The prosecutor in the case claimed the surgeon then tried to cover up his mistake by spending hours searching for the necessary equipment to reattach the boy’s penis instead of sending him straight to hospital.

UnfairRepresent posted...
The 59-year-old surgeon had not violated medical rules by attempting to reattach the penis, even though that solution was not “ideal” said the court, particularly because he did not have the right equipment to hand.

Bullshit! He should not have tried to do anything of the sort! You put it on ice and go to the hospital RIGHT AWAY. PERIOD. Not doing so is total negligence.


Well this is what the defense had to say:
However defence lawyer Charles Joye said his client told the father to take his son to Geneva University Hospital (HUG) immediately, and that he could not be held responsible for the “unforeseeable act” – meaning the taking of photos – that caused the accident.
---
The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board.
"You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me."
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1