Current Events > Doctor acquitted of neglilgence after accidentially slicing off a boys penis.

(+) Yeah! (+)

A surgeon who cut off a four-year-old boy’s penis during a circumcision operation that went wrong has been acquitted of causing bodily harm through negligence.

The young victim was taken by his parents to the doctor's Geneva surgery to be circumcised, an event considered by many faiths as a ritual to be celebrated.

During the operation the boy’s father was taking photos. At the crucial moment he raised his hand to take a photo and his son turned towards him, moving his pelvis and causing the surgeon to severe the penis which fell to the floor.

The prosecutor in the case claimed the surgeon then tried to cover up his mistake by spending hours searching for the necessary equipment to reattach the boy’s penis instead of sending him straight to hospital.

However defence lawyer Charles Joye said his client told the father to take his son to Geneva University Hospital (HUG) immediately, and that he could not be held responsible for the “unforeseeable act” – meaning the taking of photos – that caused the accident.

In its judgement on Tuesday the court said the factors involved had made the accident “unforeseeable”, reported Le Temps.

The 59-year-old surgeon had not violated medical rules by attempting to reattach the penis, even though that solution was not “ideal” said the court, particularly because he did not have the right equipment to hand.

Speaking after the court’s decision on Tuesday Joye said: “The court recognizes that the surgeon is not responsible when an unforeseeable event, such as in this case, causes an imprecise action.”

He added: “The event that took place was an unfortunate accident, not caused by the doctor, and his behaviour testifies to his cool head as well as his skill”.

However the judgement was criticized by the lawyer of the boy’s parents, who said the court ignored the fact the doctor created an unsafe situation by letting the victim’s father take photos “certainly for commercial ends”.

Full Article: https://www.thelocal.ch/20170419/geneva-doctor-acquitted-of-negligence-after-severing-boys-penis



"I wanna take photos of a man multilating my son's gentials."

Religious people and Liberals whine everytime people point this out but one day the human race is going to look back on genital multilation of children the same way we today look back on sacrifices for the sun God.
---

Don't take pictures.

Problem solved.
---

What a dick
---

Total bullshit. Circumcision in general and the taking of the photos but more relevant:

UnfairRepresent posted...

The prosecutor in the case claimed the surgeon then tried to cover up his mistake by spending hours searching for the necessary equipment to reattach the boy’s penis instead of sending him straight to hospital.

UnfairRepresent posted...

The 59-year-old surgeon had not violated medical rules by attempting to reattach the penis, even though that solution was not “ideal” said the court, particularly because he did not have the right equipment to hand.

Bullshit! He should not have tried to do anything of the sort! You put it on ice and go to the hospital RIGHT AWAY. PERIOD. Not doing so is total negligence.
---

Totally the father's fault

Also creepy as fuck
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Religious people and Liberals whine everytime people point this out but one day the human race is going to look back on genital multilation of children the same way we today look back on sacrifices for the sun God.

Um, what? We're the ones fighting against it.
---

gunplagirl posted...

Totally the father's fault

The actual cutting? Yes. What happened after? No.
---

Sir Will posted...

Total bullshit. Circumcision in general and the taking of the photos but more relevant:

UnfairRepresent posted...

The prosecutor in the case claimed the surgeon then tried to cover up his mistake by spending hours searching for the necessary equipment to reattach the boy’s penis instead of sending him straight to hospital.

UnfairRepresent posted...

The 59-year-old surgeon had not violated medical rules by attempting to reattach the penis, even though that solution was not “ideal” said the court, particularly because he did not have the right equipment to hand.

Bullshit! He should not have tried to do anything of the sort! You put it on ice and go to the hospital RIGHT AWAY. PERIOD. Not doing so is total negligence.

Legally? It isn't negligence. He told the father to go to the hospital. The father didn't so the surgeon tried his best with what he had.
---

Sir Will posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Totally the father's fault

The actual cutting? Yes. What happened after? No.

He was told to go to the hospital. He opted not to. He's also the one who distracted the kid
---

Sir Will posted...

Total bullshit. Circumcision in general and the taking of the photos but more relevant:

UnfairRepresent posted...

The prosecutor in the case claimed the surgeon then tried to cover up his mistake by spending hours searching for the necessary equipment to reattach the boy’s penis instead of sending him straight to hospital.

UnfairRepresent posted...

The 59-year-old surgeon had not violated medical rules by attempting to reattach the penis, even though that solution was not “ideal” said the court, particularly because he did not have the right equipment to hand.

Bullshit! He should not have tried to do anything of the sort! You put it on ice and go to the hospital RIGHT AWAY. PERIOD. Not doing so is total negligence.

Well this is what the defense had to say:
However defence lawyer Charles Joye said his client told the father to take his son to Geneva University Hospital (HUG) immediately, and that he could not be held responsible for the “unforeseeable act” – meaning the taking of photos – that caused the accident.
---

What kind of circumcision was this guy doing that he lopped a dick off
---

Sir Will posted...

Um, what? We're the ones fighting against it.

No you are not Charlie.

Every time peope try to battle child genital multilation, the Liberals get furious for being "Anti-semitic" and "not respecting cultural differences."
---

gunplagirl posted...

Sir Will posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Totally the father's fault

The actual cutting? Yes. What happened after? No.

He was told to go to the hospital. He opted not to. He's also the one who distracted the kid

Indeed. I can't disagree with the ruling.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Sir Will posted...

Um, what? We're the ones fighting against it.

No you are not Charlie.

Every time peope try to battle child genital multilation, the Liberals get furious for being "Anti-semitic" and "not respecting cultural differences."

...no.
---

Ok

I challenge you to go up to your liberal and Jewish friends of yours and tell them that you are against child circumcision

You'll be treated like Donald Trump carrying a glass of piss
---

And he was never seen again
---

I don;t get how it went from a circumcision to lopping off the entire dick. where was the knife? it should have been at the top of the dick, not the bottom

UnfairRepresent posted...

Ok

I challenge you to go up to your liberal and Jewish friends of yours and tell them that you are against child circumcision

You'll be treated like Donald Trump carrying a glass of piss

I'm liberal, I'm against child circumcision, and my liberal, non-Jewish friends agree with me.

Edit: Also, I was raised Jewish, loosely.
---

Funny why circumcision is even such a big thing in America because it was believed to stop boys from masturbating. Not only has that been proven false, but now more than 50% of American boys have their tips of their penis chopped off because of it.
---

Zikten posted...

I don;t get how it went from a circumcision to lopping off the entire dick. where was the knife? it should have been at the top of the dick, not the bottom

A baby's penis is smaller than you think.
---

Zikten posted...

I don;t get how it went from a circumcision to lopping off the entire dick. where was the knife? it should have been at the top of the dick, not the bottom

At the crucial moment he raised his hand to take a photo and his son turned towards him, moving his pelvis and causing the surgeon to severe the penis which fell to the floor.

---

megamanfreakXD posted...

Zikten posted...

I don;t get how it went from a circumcision to lopping off the entire dick. where was the knife? it should have been at the top of the dick, not the bottom

A baby's penis is smaller than you think.

He was 4.

UnfairRepresent posted...

I challenge you to go up to your liberal and Jewish friends of yours and tell them that you are against child circumcision

I don't have any jewish friends. But, um, of course they'd likely be for it, their religion does it too. What is your point? Whatever.
---

Man, this is horrifying, I feel so sorry for the boy, I can't even put it to words. I feel like he's really losing out on a huge part of life because of this... I don't want to blame anyone for such a horrific accident.
---

Mister_Spyker posted...

I don't want to blame anyone for such a horrific accident.

the dumbass dad for snapping photos

Shouldn't the dad be charged with trying to create child porn @27_Sandman_40
---

This is another reason why baby/child circumcision is bullshit. It's a dumb "tradition".

"waaah anti-semite!"

And I didn't know that liberals were huge circumcision defenders.
---

GiftedACIII posted...

Shouldn't the dad be charged with trying to create child porn

...no.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Zikten posted...

I don;t get how it went from a circumcision to lopping off the entire dick. where was the knife? it should have been at the top of the dick, not the bottom

At the crucial moment he raised his hand to take a photo and his son turned towards him, moving his pelvis and causing the surgeon to severe the penis which fell to the floor.

With modern circumcision techniques it's pretty fucking hard to do that tbh, and even then why wasn't the child in a restraint? Sounds pretty fishy, i do circumcisions all the time and I don't see how he could have fucked up that bad unless he was free styling with a scalpel which would be ridiculous and not the standard of care
---

NeuralLaxative posted...

Sounds pretty fishy, i do circumcisions all the time

I hope this is not true
---

Sativa_Rose posted...

NeuralLaxative posted...

Sounds pretty fishy, i do circumcisions all the time

I hope this is not true

It's not
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

NeuralLaxative posted...

Sounds pretty fishy, i do circumcisions all the time

I hope this is not true

It's not

Several people on this board know I'm a pediatrician, but by all means, continue your contrarian posting style
---

NeuralLaxative posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

NeuralLaxative posted...

Sounds pretty fishy, i do circumcisions all the time

I hope this is not true

It's not

Several people on this board know I'm a pediatrician, but by all means, continue your contrarian posting style

If you had one of those titles in World of Warcraft, it would be

NeuralLaxative, Mutilator of Children
---

NeuralLaxative posted...

Several people on this board know I'm a pediatrician, but by all means, continue your contrarian posting style

do the babies cry when you do it?

Zikten posted...

NeuralLaxative posted...

Several people on this board know I'm a pediatrician, but by all means, continue your contrarian posting style

do the babies cry when you do it?

Eh, they cry like any baby would for something like a vaccine; they feel the initial needle stick for the nerve block, but after that they don't feel anything but light pressure. We also give them some Tylenol before hand and some sucrose to suck on so they typically stay happy throughout the majority of the procedure
---

27_Sandman_40 posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Shouldn't the dad be charged with trying to create child porn @27_Sandman_40

You're legitimately insane.

You've claimed naked children is pedophilia and is CP. This is taking pics of a naked child and an ACTUAL child at that. By your moronic logic this is CP.
---

27_Sandman_40 posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

27_Sandman_40 posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Shouldn't the dad be charged with trying to create child porn @27_Sandman_40

You're legitimately insane.

You've claimed naked children is pedophilia and is CP. This is taking pics of a naked child and an ACTUAL child at that. By your moronic logic this is CP.

By your moronic interpretation of what I was explaining to you as you defended pedophiles for 500 posts, sure.

This is like the ninth time you've tagged me since. You clearly have issues.

"Defending pedophiles" as in saying only you're psychotic enough to believe simply being a pedophile should be illegal which anyone who has functioning brain cells know is absurd. In your moronic view, the law itself defends pedophiles.
And lol wtf, I've literally only tagged you twice. Once here, and the other in that 500 topic you were already in. I've never tagged you in any other topic. You are actually psychotic.
You are one of the densest posters on this board. You have no logic, only emotion. This is much more cp than drawn naked children yet you're fine with it
---

27_Sandman_40 posted...

Except it's not. I've explained multiple times that there's no non-pedophilia reason to draw a naked child. Taking a picture of your newborn son has sentimental value. Pictures of drawn naked children can only serve to provide sexual response.

And before you say "LOL MEDICAL BOOKS ARE CP LOL PSYCHO", remember we were always talking about lolicon.

There are plenty of reasons to draw a naked child that isn't because of sexual reasons including for story, for art, for symbolism, for drawing a crime scene etc. In fact, unless you're a pedophile, naked children by default are not sexual.
So no, you are utterly wrong as always.
---

I can't seperate my knees
---

27_Sandman_40 posted...

Explain how that applies to lolicon?

You're talking about naked children. Lolicon doesn't have to have naked children.
27_Sandman_40 posted...

You really want to do this again? Are you that afraid of lolicon being illegal?

No, as I said before I call out people who make extremely stupid posts like you.
---

That's messed up. Negligence is one thing that needs work in law amidst other things. The law has been corrupted beyond repair because of people with money. More proof people with money can do whatever they want. Doctors are really difficult to go after. Nevermind the court costs, time and everything it probably cost these people to go after him.

kg88222 posted...

That's messed up. Negligence is one thing that needs work in law amidst other things. The law has been corrupted beyond repair because of people with money. More proof people with money can do whatever they want. Doctors are really difficult to go after. Nevermind the court costs, time and everything it probably cost these people to go after him.

Uh, the father is the one that made the child turn with his picture taking and then again when he didn't want the Doctor to take the kid to a hospital and instead have the Doctor fix it.
---

I agree but why was the father even allowed in there doing that or doing that. I would have told him to get out. Sounds like an accident but even still. The father is just as moronic and then going after him that's the point too. Probably some idiot family as well.

In the end it sounds more like just a bad accident and tragic but like i said negligence is something that needs work. So this kid is scarred for life and no one is at fault. Great job.

kg88222 posted...

I agree but why was the father even allowed in there doing that or doing that.

To take pictures
---

kg88222 posted...

I agree but why was the father even allowed in there doing that or doing that. I would have told him to get out. Sounds like an accident but even still. The father is just as moronic and then going after him that's the point too. Probably some idiot family as well.

In the end it sounds more like just a bad accident and tragic but like i said negligence is something that needs work. So this kid is scarred for life and no one is at fault. Great job.

So you want the Doctor to sue the father?
---