LogFAQs > #877590704

That_Happened posted...

I'm not trying to start an argument, I promise. But yesterday you said it's on poor people to make better decisions, and stop having kids they can't afford and taking your tax money. That the childless and single shouldn't have to support those who choose to have children.

So if you're not interested in giving a little of yours to help the many, I don't know if there's much hope for corporations...or even politicians who are often pretty much bought out. There's a lot of poverty out there but almost all of us think the sacrifice should come from somewhere else. Again that's not you insult you. I'm sure we all feel we're stretched to our limits right now

Nothing I said yesterday contradicts anything I'm saying today. You can maintain that people not have kids they can't afford, that people reduce their impact on public services, etc, and still maintain that we need to find solutions for these problems.

Last year I contributed around $20,000 to the pot and this year I'll have contributed around $30,000 to the pot. That's a lot more than "giving a little of yours" bro.
---

These people are literally ignorant of the law. It's astounding. As the situation escalates I will come out victorious. - DawkinsNumber4