LogFAQs > #877598726

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Doctor acquitted of neglilgence after accidentially slicing off a boys penis.
GiftedACIII 04/20/17 10:14:41 PM #39:	27_Sandman_40 posted... GiftedACIII posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... GiftedACIII posted... Shouldn't the dad be charged with trying to create child porn @27_Sandman_40 You're legitimately insane. You've claimed naked children is pedophilia and is CP. This is taking pics of a naked child and an ACTUAL child at that. By your moronic logic this is CP. By your moronic interpretation of what I was explaining to you as you defended pedophiles for 500 posts, sure. This is like the ninth time you've tagged me since. You clearly have issues. "Defending pedophiles" as in saying only you're psychotic enough to believe simply being a pedophile should be illegal which anyone who has functioning brain cells know is absurd. In your moronic view, the law itself defends pedophiles. And lol wtf, I've literally only tagged you twice. Once here, and the other in that 500 topic you were already in. I've never tagged you in any other topic. You are actually psychotic. You are one of the densest posters on this board. You have no logic, only emotion. This is much more cp than drawn naked children yet you're fine with it --- </topic> <cite>GiftedACIII posted [p:877598726] in Doctor acq... [t:75260281]...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote>Shouldn't the dad be charged with trying to create child porn @27_Sandman_40</quote> You're legitimately insane.</quote> You've claimed naked children is pedophilia and is CP. This is taking pics of a naked child and an ACTUAL child at that. By your moronic logic this is CP.</quote> By your moronic interpretation of what I was explaining to you as you defended pedophiles for 500 posts, sure. This is like the ninth time you've tagged me since. You clearly have issues.</quote> "Defending pedophiles" as in saying only you're psychotic enough to believe simply being a pedophile should be illegal which anyone who has functioning brain cells know is absurd. In your moronic view, the law itself defends pedophiles. And lol wtf, I've literally only tagged you twice. Once here, and the other in that 500 topic you were already in. I've never tagged you in any other topic. You are actually psychotic. You are one of the densest posters on this board. You have no logic, only emotion. This is much more cp than drawn naked children yet you're fine with it --- </topic></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1