LogFAQs > #877600114

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Doctor acquitted of neglilgence after accidentially slicing off a boys penis.
GiftedACIII 04/20/17 10:38:41 PM #41:	27_Sandman_40 posted... Except it's not. I've explained multiple times that there's no non-pedophilia reason to draw a naked child. Taking a picture of your newborn son has sentimental value. Pictures of drawn naked children can only serve to provide sexual response. And before you say "LOL MEDICAL BOOKS ARE CP LOL PSYCHO", remember we were always talking about lolicon. There are plenty of reasons to draw a naked child that isn't because of sexual reasons including for story, for art, for symbolism, for drawing a crime scene etc. In fact, unless you're a pedophile, naked children by default are not sexual. So no, you are utterly wrong as always. --- </topic> <cite>GiftedACIII posted [p:877600114] in Doctor acq... [t:75260281]...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote>Except it's not. I've explained multiple times that there's no non-pedophilia reason to draw a naked child. Taking a picture of your newborn son has sentimental value. Pictures of drawn naked children can only serve to provide sexual response. And before you say "LOL MEDICAL BOOKS ARE CP LOL PSYCHO", remember we were always talking about lolicon.</quote> There are plenty of reasons to draw a naked child that isn't because of sexual reasons including for story, for art, for symbolism, for drawing a crime scene etc. In fact, unless you're a pedophile, naked children by default are not sexual. So no, you are utterly wrong as always. --- </topic></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1