LogFAQs > #878682403

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Mercenaries Draft, Week 0 Results: I think I've played this song before...
Corrik 05/08/17 2:48:55 AM #71:	MajinZidane posted... well, for one, we can totally get rid of the +3 bid and just make it so being the RNG person settles ties. I also think that if you're the person who doesn't get to decide attacker/defender, then maybe you should get the +3 for tier bid. maybe instead of refunding GP on a loss, you can give the loser of a tier bid +x next week. Maybe if you're on a losing streak for tier bids or matches, you keep on getting +y(x), where y is the number of losses in a row and x is some static value like 3 or 4. I'm a fan of refund (full or partial) immediately or during results, though. Read my suggestion. I think it is a perfect fix and should be voted on. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:878682403] in Mercenarie... [t:75322431]...</cite> <quote><cite>MajinZidane posted...</cite> <quote>well, for one, we can totally get rid of the +3 bid and just make it so being the RNG person settles ties. I also think that if you're the person who doesn't get to decide attacker/defender, then maybe you should get the +3 for tier bid. maybe instead of refunding GP on a loss, you can give the loser of a tier bid +x next week. Maybe if you're on a losing streak for tier bids or matches, you keep on getting +y(x), where y is the number of losses in a row and x is some static value like 3 or 4. I'm a fan of refund (full or partial) immediately or during results, though.</quote> Read my suggestion. I think it is a perfect fix and should be voted on. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1