LogFAQs > #878682558

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Mercenaries Draft, Week 0 Results: I think I've played this song before...
MajinZidane 05/08/17 2:54:39 AM #75:	Corrik posted... MajinZidane posted... well, for one, we can totally get rid of the +3 bid and just make it so being the RNG person settles ties. I also think that if you're the person who doesn't get to decide attacker/defender, then maybe you should get the +3 for tier bid. maybe instead of refunding GP on a loss, you can give the loser of a tier bid +x next week. Maybe if you're on a losing streak for tier bids or matches, you keep on getting +y(x), where y is the number of losses in a row and x is some static value like 3 or 4. I'm a fan of refund (full or partial) immediately or during results, though. Read my suggestion. I think it is a perfect fix and should be voted on. yeah, you have all the same ideas as me. Bid winner has to pick tier or attacker, bid loser gets a refund and gets to have the other thing. Seems fair! The exact way the refund happens, I'm not super concerned with. +1 Why do we have/need the +3, though? I feel like that's just a carry-over from defender terrain bonus. Maybe just have the bold person win a tie if there is one, else everyone is +0. That eliminates Lopen's losing tier bid concern and helps to mitigate the huge advantage winning the RNG gives you. Hell, with your system, we don't even need a randomly chosen bold person because you're bidding on attacker or tier. In the case of a tie, do the coin flip then, I guess! --- Virtue - "You don't need a reason to Boko United." <cite>MajinZidane posted [p:878682558] in Mercenarie... [t:75322431]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MajinZidane posted...</cite> <quote>well, for one, we can totally get rid of the +3 bid and just make it so being the RNG person settles ties. I also think that if you're the person who doesn't get to decide attacker/defender, then maybe you should get the +3 for tier bid. maybe instead of refunding GP on a loss, you can give the loser of a tier bid +x next week. Maybe if you're on a losing streak for tier bids or matches, you keep on getting +y(x), where y is the number of losses in a row and x is some static value like 3 or 4. I'm a fan of refund (full or partial) immediately or during results, though.</quote> Read my suggestion. I think it is a perfect fix and should be voted on.</quote> yeah, you have all the same ideas as me. Bid winner has to pick tier or attacker, bid loser gets a refund and gets to have the other thing. Seems fair! The exact way the refund happens, I'm not super concerned with. +1 Why do we have/need the +3, though? I feel like that's just a carry-over from defender terrain bonus. Maybe just have the bold person win a tie if there is one, else everyone is +0. That eliminates Lopen's losing tier bid concern and helps to mitigate the huge advantage winning the RNG gives you. Hell, with your system, we don't even need a randomly chosen bold person because you're bidding on attacker or tier. In the case of a tie, do the coin flip then, I guess! --- Virtue - "You don't need a reason to Boko United."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1