LogFAQs > #879033923

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	So, Comey does intend to testify, just insists on it being public
HiddenRoar 05/13/17 3:34:40 PM #19:	Gids_goft posted... What does that have to do with anything though? Comey near single-handedly cost a Democrat the election, so what do you think the committee being comprised of Democrats is supposed to mean? Holy fuck short term memory. You mean the same party that's calling for a special prosecutor into the Russian probe right now? Do you want me to spell out why the party who has a stake in the possible collusion between Trump and Russia would want to hear what the guy who was charge of said investigation has to say? Please don't add your two cents in the matter if they're this fucking useless. Ampelas posted... You stated my exact meaning... Think about it. The committee is two sided, so with a private hearing, you get two stories. One side the Trumpanzees believe, one side the leftists believe and normal people don't know which to believe. A public hearing removes the option for a biased retelling, as it would be public record. I think you misunderstood me. Wow, just a few minutes ago you claimed the committee was nuthugging the Trump administration in the topic you made in politics. Now you're claiming the members are polar opposites that would confuse the public unless the media gets involved? Does media not lean left/right? Just earlier this week the left-wing media managed to convince liberals that the AHCA didn't involve women or minorities. <cite>HiddenRoar posted [p:879033923] in So, Comey ... [t:75342088]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gids_goft posted...</cite> <quote> What does that have to do with anything though? Comey near single-handedly cost a Democrat the election, so what do you think the committee being comprised of Democrats is supposed to mean?</quote> Holy fuck short term memory. You mean the same party that's calling for a special prosecutor into the Russian probe right now? Do you want me to spell out why the party who has a stake in the possible collusion between Trump and Russia would want to hear what the guy who was charge of said investigation has to say? Please don't add your two cents in the matter if they're this fucking useless. <cite>Ampelas posted...</cite> <quote> You stated my exact meaning... Think about it. The committee is two sided, so with a private hearing, you get two stories. One side the Trumpanzees believe, one side the leftists believe and normal people don't know which to believe. A public hearing removes the option for a biased retelling, as it would be public record. I think you misunderstood me.</quote> Wow, just a few minutes ago you claimed the committee was nuthugging the Trump administration in the topic you made in politics. Now you're claiming the members are polar opposites that would confuse the public unless the media gets involved? Does media not lean left/right? Just earlier this week the left-wing media managed to convince liberals that the AHCA didn't involve women or minorities.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1