LogFAQs > #879064973

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Hypothetically, if collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia is found
Zeus 05/14/17 1:27:35 AM #41:	Mead posted... Zeus posted... I wonder how many people were insisting there was no evidence of wrongdoing before Obama was once again confirmed to be a US citizen and served out a 8 year term When there is smoke it only makes sense to see if there is a fire. One example has a fuck ton of smoke, the one you are using had none. Deal with it. They have equal amounts of smoke and will have equal amounts of fire. Deal with it. Erik_P posted... jedirood posted... The fact that people get so violent and hostile over minor things is just sad The guy that's subject to a criminal investigation just fired the guy leading the investigation. That's not small at all. That could easily be considered obstruction of justice and is grounds for impeachment. LOL! Oh god, you're literally the worst. There are just so many factual inaccuracies that it's impossible to know where to start. First off, it's 100% legal to fire Comey under any conditions and no, that doesn't constitute obstruction which is an ILLEGAL act. Second, by that logic, any official could open an investigation against somebody for unlimited job security since it'd make them fire-proof. Third, and most importantly, it's NOT even a criminal investigation. You can't just toss words around without knowing what they mean. Right now, they're engaging in general fact-finding which, if they found anything, could form the basis of a criminal investigation. The fact that you know nothing about the US legal system wouldn't be so bad if you weren't allegedly a citizen. BlackScythe0 posted... Trump stated he was going to fire Comey no matter what they said. He just got them to write a paper to throw them under the bus. One of the people cited, btw, claimed he recused himself from these topics. Which is a extra level of corrupt. That's not what happened. Well, mostly not. Trump did say that he had already made the decision to fire Comey, but he didn't "force" anybody to write a paper. As for Sessions, he recused himself from the investigation, NOT from doing his normal job. The decision to fire Comey has no direct ties to any investigation even if it could indirectly impede it (but, realistically, it doesn't even impede it because Comey wasn't personally doing all the legwork) --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:879064973] in Hypothetic... [t:75336031]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>I wonder how many people were insisting there was no evidence of wrongdoing before Obama was once again confirmed to be a US citizen and served out a 8 year term</quote> When there is smoke it only makes sense to see if there is a fire. One example has a fuck ton of smoke, the one you are using had none. Deal with it.</quote> They have equal amounts of smoke and will have equal amounts of fire. Deal with it. <cite>Erik_P posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jedirood posted...</cite> <quote>The fact that people get so violent and hostile over minor things is just sad</quote> The guy that's subject to a criminal investigation just fired the guy leading the investigation. That's not small at all. That could easily be considered obstruction of justice and is grounds for impeachment.</quote> LOL! Oh god, you're literally the worst. There are just so many factual inaccuracies that it's impossible to know where to start. First off, it's 100% legal to fire Comey under any conditions and no, that doesn't constitute obstruction which is an ILLEGAL act. Second, by that logic, any official could open an investigation against somebody for unlimited job security since it'd make them fire-proof. Third, and most importantly, it's NOT even a criminal investigation. You can't just toss words around without knowing what they mean. Right now, they're engaging in general fact-finding which, if they found anything, could form the basis of a criminal investigation. The fact that you know nothing about the US legal system wouldn't be so bad if you weren't allegedly a citizen. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Trump stated he was going to fire Comey no matter what they said. He just got them to write a paper to throw them under the bus. One of the people cited, btw, claimed he recused himself from these topics. Which is a extra level of corrupt.</quote> That's not what happened. Well, mostly not. Trump did say that he had already made the decision to fire Comey, but he didn't "force" anybody to write a paper. As for Sessions, he recused himself from the investigation, NOT from doing his normal job. The decision to fire Comey has no direct ties to any investigation even if it could indirectly impede it (but, realistically, it doesn't even impede it because Comey wasn't personally doing all the legwork) --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1