LogFAQs > #880370430

It depends on context. Loli meaning slightly younger than 18 -- after all, the term comes from Lolita which was iirc was about a 15 y/o -- is understandable because 18 is an arbitrary cutoff (and development isn't uniform). If we're talking like younger than 12, it's just creepy no matter what. Likewise, if furry counts humans with small animal features -- like Nekomimi -- that's understandable, then some levels of anthro are kinda understandable but eventually the more animal it looks the creepier it looks and the guys who dress in costume to have sex just strike me as weird.

Traps in all contexts seem creepy although reverse-traps are occasionally okay.

WastelandCowboy posted...

Lolis - illegal. Being sexually-attracted to children is not okay and definitely not legal. But whatever. If the person wants to go to jail or prison for molesting/raping a child, that's their problem.

Actually, the attraction itself is technically legal (which you do seem to acknowledge in later posts) but various forms of CP -- whether or not it's depicting a real child (which, honestly, makes no sense because drawings are treated the same as photos and kids are getting arrested for owning Dragonball manga) -- are not and, of course, people aren't allowed to sleep with kids in most industrialized nations (unless they marry them first, as RC recently pointed out). In the US, apparently actresses -- over the age of 18 -- can legally portray children but in some nations that's actually illegal. Granted, traps are illegal depending on your country as well.

Furries are probably a more gray area, but countries with anti-porn laws would probably outlaw it.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|
In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash