Poll of the Day > How would you rank the following fetishes? (Lolis, traps, and furries?)

(+) Yeah! (+)

Rank them from best to worst. What do you think?

Edit: lolis only refers to anime girls in this case
---

Furries > traps > lolis

Furries - legal.

Traps - legal.

Lolis - illegal. Being sexually-attracted to children is not okay and definitely not legal. But whatever. If the person wants to go to jail or prison for molesting/raping a child, that's their problem.

Traps > furries > lolis

Traps are still good above the waist, furries are just plain weird, lolis are going to get you put on a list (even if it's only child-like features that tickle your fancy).
---

WastelandCowboy posted...

Being sexually-attracted to children is... definitely not legal.

False

Furries are definitely the least bad of the three.

Was tough to rank the other two. I assumed loli means primarily anime (not real) and girls who just look and dress young but are actually legal, since otherwise it's just being a pedo and doesn't really need a unique name. So I put loli above trap.
But if loli does include pedos, then yeah, it belongs last.

PurpIePerson posted...

WastelandCowboy posted...

Being sexually-attracted to children is... definitely not legal.

False

How so?

Genuinely curious to see your reasoning for this.

Because it literally isn't. You cannot be arrested for being attracted to children. Please show me the law.

Furries > traps > lolis
Furries - - I like catgirls.
Traps - I'm not completely against this.
lolis - Too much like children and I'm not attracted to those.
---

PurpIePerson posted...

Because it literally isn't. You cannot be arrested for being attracted to children. Please show me the law.

Okay, now I see what you mean.

Sure, yeah, you won't be arrested for being attracted to children. But acting on those feelings of attractions? Yes.

Updated the OP

WastelandCowboy posted...

PurpIePerson posted...

Because it literally isn't. You cannot be arrested for being attracted to children. Please show me the law.

Okay, now I see what you mean.

Sure, yeah, you won't be arrested for being attracted to children. But acting on those feelings of attractions? Yes.

Those are 2 separate things, tbh.
---

BallerXRosetta- posted...

Updated the OP

WastelandCowboy posted...

PurpIePerson posted...

Because it literally isn't. You cannot be arrested for being attracted to children. Please show me the law.

Okay, now I see what you mean.

Sure, yeah, you won't be arrested for being attracted to children. But acting on those feelings of attractions? Yes.

Those are 2 separate things, tbh.

I won't argue that. However, it's logical that being attracted to children can lead to molesting children. All depends on the person with these fetishes.

Voted furries being the worst. :think:
---

WastelandCowboy posted...

BallerXRosetta- posted...

Updated the OP

WastelandCowboy posted...

PurpIePerson posted...

Because it literally isn't. You cannot be arrested for being attracted to children. Please show me the law.

Okay, now I see what you mean.

Sure, yeah, you won't be arrested for being attracted to children. But acting on those feelings of attractions? Yes.

Those are 2 separate things, tbh.

I won't argue that. However, it's logical that being attracted to children can lead to molesting children. All depends on the person with these fetishes.

Yeah, having that inclination is not an excuse to act on it.
---

assuming lolis mean 2d only, they all have their own charm, but traps>Furries>lolis.
---

Loli is basically pedophilia so that's obviously the worst and not okay.

Furries are great, Traps are great, but a furry trap? Now that's god tier..
---

One does not pass judgement on fetishes.

So long as they are legal. If you pass judgement on someone else's kink you are just a horrible human being. And that's a justified and factual judgement.
---

It depends on context. Loli meaning slightly younger than 18 -- after all, the term comes from Lolita which was iirc was about a 15 y/o -- is understandable because 18 is an arbitrary cutoff (and development isn't uniform). If we're talking like younger than 12, it's just creepy no matter what. Likewise, if furry counts humans with small animal features -- like Nekomimi -- that's understandable, then some levels of anthro are kinda understandable but eventually the more animal it looks the creepier it looks and the guys who dress in costume to have sex just strike me as weird.

Traps in all contexts seem creepy although reverse-traps are occasionally okay.

WastelandCowboy posted...

Lolis - illegal. Being sexually-attracted to children is not okay and definitely not legal. But whatever. If the person wants to go to jail or prison for molesting/raping a child, that's their problem.

Actually, the attraction itself is technically legal (which you do seem to acknowledge in later posts) but various forms of CP -- whether or not it's depicting a real child (which, honestly, makes no sense because drawings are treated the same as photos and kids are getting arrested for owning Dragonball manga) -- are not and, of course, people aren't allowed to sleep with kids in most industrialized nations (unless they marry them first, as RC recently pointed out). In the US, apparently actresses -- over the age of 18 -- can legally portray children but in some nations that's actually illegal. Granted, traps are illegal depending on your country as well.

Furries are probably a more gray area, but countries with anti-porn laws would probably outlaw it.
---

if you kinkshame lolis Im going to killshame your action games
---

Loli > trap > furry.

There are a few lolis I like, but it's mainly character-based and not just because they're lolis. I'm pretty indifferent to traps, and I don't care for furries at all.

TheSlinja posted...

if you kinkshame lolis Im going to killshame your action games

^This
---

Zeus posted...

kids are getting arrested for owning Dragonball manga

Que?
---

keyblader1985 posted...

Loli > trap > furry.

Best ranking
---

slacker03150 posted...

Zeus posted...

kids are getting arrested for owning Dragonball manga

Que?

Happened in Canada at a border crossing, charges were later dropped. Worth noting that Canada also made headlines for arresting a guy who bought a sex doll they thought looked too young.
---

Loli>>>Furry>>>Traps.

By Loli, I mean one's like Shana/Louise/Taiga from Shana/Zero no Tsukaima/Toradora.Not the kind that look like actual kids, Furries I can stand just a tad bit more than I can traps, I often get more annoyed by traps than anything....
---

---

Excuse me sir, the term "trap" is highly offensive
---

Remember when Keita was legit about to go down on Mikazuki?
---

*smacks loli-posters*

Hey! Who said you could leave the Anime topic! Shoo! Shoo!
---

I don't even know what traps is.

keyblader1985 posted...

Remember when Keita was legit about to go down on Mikazuki?

no
---

Zeus posted...

It depends on context. Loli meaning slightly younger than 18 -- after all, the term comes from Lolita which was iirc was about a 15 y/o -- is understandable because 18 is an arbitrary cutoff (and development isn't uniform). If we're talking like younger than 12, it's just creepy no matter what. Likewise, if furry counts humans with small animal features -- like Nekomimi -- that's understandable, then some levels of anthro are kinda understandable but eventually the more animal it looks the creepier it looks and the guys who dress in costume to have sex just strike me as weird.

Traps in all contexts seem creepy although reverse-traps are occasionally okay.

This is basically what I was gonna post. Trap is pretty self-explanatory, but the other two have so many variations in their meaning that I can't really vote for one or the other. Loli can just be relatively flat girls that are short, or they can be something illegal and creepy. Furry can be the ears and tail of an animal, like a cat, or they can be the full on costumes like the conventions, which is not illegal but I find it creepy. Also, sexualized MLP and Sonic stuff. No.

Since we're on this topic, I actually don't like how people are so against legal loli. Short and flat girls aren't that uncommon and I feel bad for those like that. If they get a boyfriend, he's going to be treated like a creep? That just seems unfair, what're they supposed to do about it beyond plastic surgery?
---

Plenty of men – maybe more than we think (or would like to think) – occasionally experiment with pushing the limits of their sexual imagination by fantasizing about something taboo: rape, for example. So long as we (that’s a generic “we”, by the way) keep our darker thoughts safely locked up inside our own skulls and always remember that the line separating fantasy from reality is a fucking great big, yellow-and-black tape stencilled with POLICE LINE DO NOT CROSS, I feel that's generally permissible and I wouldn’t fall over myself too hard to prosecute thoughtcrime.
---

avatarmight posted...

Since we're on this topic, I actually don't like how people are so against legal loli. Short and flat girls aren't that uncommon and I feel bad for those like that. If they get a boyfriend, he's going to be treated like a creep? That just seems unfair, what're they supposed to do about it beyond plastic surgery?

That's always bothered me too. If you're attracted to someone under 18 with a well developed body, you're a creeper. If you're attracted to someone over 18 with an underdeveloped body, you're a creeper.

Basically if they're not 18+ with a fully developed body, you're some kind of disgusting weirdo. That mindset goes against nature, and it's incredibly insulting to anyone over 18 who fits the description. It's basically saying no one is ever allowed to be attracted to them.
---

Loli = Traps = Furries = Gross
---

keyblader1985 posted...

That's always bothered me too. If you're attracted to someone under 18 with a well developed body, you're a creeper. If you're attracted to someone over 18 with an underdeveloped body, you're a creeper.

I say if you're attracted to someone over 18 with a body developed like a sea lion, you've ruined porn, because that makes up 90% of it currently.

jamieyello3 posted...

keyblader1985 posted...

That's always bothered me too. If you're attracted to someone under 18 with a well developed body, you're a creeper. If you're attracted to someone over 18 with an underdeveloped body, you're a creeper.

I say if you're attracted to someone over 18 with a body developed like a sea lion, you've ruined porn, because that makes up 90% of it currently.

A sea lion? Example needed
---

If you're attracted to someone over 18 with a body that smells like a sea lion...
---

Definitely lolis>furries>traps (cuz I'm not gay)

Also, I'm assuming you mean furries like Holo or even this super doggy chick in SukaSuka. I ain't into that shit where they straight up look like an animal, more or less
---

acesxhigh posted...

jamieyello3 posted...

keyblader1985 posted...

That's always bothered me too. If you're attracted to someone under 18 with a well developed body, you're a creeper. If you're attracted to someone over 18 with an underdeveloped body, you're a creeper.

I say if you're attracted to someone over 18 with a body developed like a sea lion, you've ruined porn, because that makes up 90% of it currently.

A sea lion? Example needed

https://nationalzoo.si.edu/sites/default/files/animals/californiasealion-001.jpg
---

Goddamn this topic and its results are creepy.

Too many adults in love with their child waifus.

Funkdamental posted...

Plenty of men – maybe more than we think (or would like to think) – occasionally experiment with pushing the limits of their sexual imagination by fantasizing about something taboo: rape, for example. So long as we (that’s a generic “we”, by the way) keep our darker thoughts safely locked up inside our own skulls and always remember that the line separating fantasy from reality is a fucking great big, yellow-and-black tape stencilled with POLICE LINE DO NOT CROSS, I feel that's generally permissible and I wouldn’t fall over myself too hard to prosecute thoughtcrime.

idk, back in the day before the world turned all PC, it was cool to turn into an animal to seduce some young water nymph or maiden.
---

^No, that wasn't cool. You did it and tried to make it cool, but it was never cool.


Nade Duck posted...

keyblader1985 posted...

Remember when Keita was legit about to go down on Mikazuki?

no

---

That's hot
---

Sometimes, I feel a bit bad for the teacher lol.
---

I have no issues with Loli's as long as they aren't really realistic.
Hate furries but traps are by far the worst.

Did not expect all this trap hate tbh
---

Traps are gay and I doubt there are that many gay guys posting here
---

PimpMyRhydon posted...

Traps are gay and I doubt there are that many gay guys posting here

That except traps are thoroughly bi.

Adults into loli are sick. It's ridiculous to see some of them argue how the person that drew the character said the character is 23 so it's ok to fap to her even though she looks like a prepubescent child of about 10 years old.
---

Traps at the bottom no matter what.

Lolis probably over furries.
---