| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | How would you rank the following fetishes? (Lolis, traps, and furries?) |
| avatarmight 06/05/17 1:14:59 PM #30: | Zeus posted... It depends on context. Loli meaning slightly younger than 18 -- after all, the term comes from Lolita which was iirc was about a 15 y/o -- is understandable because 18 is an arbitrary cutoff (and development isn't uniform). If we're talking like younger than 12, it's just creepy no matter what. Likewise, if furry counts humans with small animal features -- like Nekomimi -- that's understandable, then some levels of anthro are kinda understandable but eventually the more animal it looks the creepier it looks and the guys who dress in costume to have sex just strike me as weird. This is basically what I was gonna post. Trap is pretty self-explanatory, but the other two have so many variations in their meaning that I can't really vote for one or the other. Loli can just be relatively flat girls that are short, or they can be something illegal and creepy. Furry can be the ears and tail of an animal, like a cat, or they can be the full on costumes like the conventions, which is not illegal but I find it creepy. Also, sexualized MLP and Sonic stuff. No. Since we're on this topic, I actually don't like how people are so against legal loli. Short and flat girls aren't that uncommon and I feel bad for those like that. If they get a boyfriend, he's going to be treated like a creep? That just seems unfair, what're they supposed to do about it beyond plastic surgery? --- "I mean, even the buffest gym bro can't work out his eyeballs, right? They're all equally squishy!" - Mia, Xenoblade Chronicles X ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |