LogFAQs > #882762550

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do you think it should be illegal to intentionally name Bills(law) misleadingly?
DarkKirby2500 07/12/17 2:28:53 AM #1:	Do you think it should be illegal to intentionally name Bills (law) something misleading? It should be illegal to intentionally name Bills (law) something misleading. There shouldn't be any restrictions on what they can name Bills (law). View Results The U.S. congress seems to do this quite a lot. When they want to pass a bill that benefits corporations and others who they benefit from helping rather than the citizens, they intentionally give it a misleading name to try and have to slip through without the public noticing. The "Restoring Internet Freedom" act which has the goal of removing net neutrality is only the most recent example. --- The only fool bigger than the person who knows it all is the person who argues with him. They're all complacent sheeple. Passion fights, but reason wins. <cite>DarkKirby2500 posted [p:882762550] in Do you thi... [t:75556376]...</cite> <quote> Do you think it should be illegal to intentionally name Bills (law) something misleading? It should be illegal to intentionally name Bills (law) something misleading. There shouldn't be any restrictions on what they can name Bills (law). View Results The U.S. congress seems to do this quite a lot. When they want to pass a bill that benefits corporations and others who they benefit from helping rather than the citizens, they intentionally give it a misleading name to try and have to slip through without the public noticing. The "Restoring Internet Freedom" act which has the goal of removing net neutrality is only the most recent example. --- The only fool bigger than the person who knows it all is the person who argues with him. They're all complacent sheeple. Passion fights, but reason wins.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1