LogFAQs > #971089505

Obellisk posted...

so Dumey, i've read through Page 2 of Topic 2. Things going a little slower, i may not actually be fully caught up by 7pm as i previously stated. Seeing as how its already 2:30 and well I just have other things to do today as well. But i digress.

Lopens miller claim, i remember when i initially read it. I put zero stock into it then. I noted his can't be blocked / no power anyway as well. I took all of that in and said "ok, whatever". I didn't believe it to be true then, I dont know if i'm supposed to now believe more of it, or maybe i'm wrong and its all true however I do not see how a miller claim renders lopens opinions as invalid and I think thats the big question here.

Why do you see the miller claim as a red flag? is it that all millers are liars? who hurt you?

If you've caught up with Page 2, then you've seen most of our conversation. My contention with Lopen was that I didn't really like his Topic 1 reads and brought up examples like Ulti. You have thus far basically said all your opinions have lined up with Lopen so far. Even after reading, do you agree with those Topic 1 opinions? That Ulti had a scummy play and Lopen was right for jumping on him? I asked you for clarification at the top of page 10 on Topic 1, but you may have missed that. But I referenced it again in Topic 2 and you didn't respond to it again there.
I'll have to reread some of your posts on your opinions on things like Plum. But basically what I'm getting at is if I don't like Lopen's topic 1 opinions, and your opinions all line up with his, then I don't particularly like yours either. I wanted to know if any of that had changed after reading our exchange.