LogFAQs > #971451285

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	NES VS N64 - Which was better?
bigblu89 02/09/23 4:15:30 PM #22:	Hayame_Zero posted... Yes, 2D as a whole has aged better than those early sluggish 3D games, but the NES isn't a good example since a lot of the games on NES were completely broken. All Nintendo-made games were good, and there were a handful of publishers who made great games, but the rest were very poor quality. Also, the difficulty of many of them were absurd. Although the mediocre SNES games were better quality than either of them. Difficulty was absurd because a lot of early NES games were arcade ports that weren't made to be "beaten". --- It takes zero effort to be a good person. <cite>bigblu89 posted [p:971451285] in NES VS N64... [t:80342021]...</cite> <quote>Hayame_Zero posted... </cite><quote>Yes, 2D as a whole has aged better than those early sluggish 3D games, but the NES isn't a good example since a lot of the games on NES were completely broken. All Nintendo-made games were good, and there were a handful of publishers who made great games, but the rest were very poor quality. Also, the difficulty of many of them were absurd.Although the mediocre SNES games were better quality than either of them.</quote>Difficulty was absurd because a lot of early NES games were arcade ports that weren't made to be "beaten". --- It takes zero effort to be a good person.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1