LogFAQs > #972604106

I came into today thinking Id likely vote Plum, not for his weak defense of Ulti but rather the combo of downplaying that defense and simultaneously scum hunting among everyone else who weakly defended Ulti. Mzero has done a nice job documenting this.

I still think lynching Plum is a solid option but this business overnight is an absolute mess and trying to untangle it deserves some prioritization.

Question, do we know how it generally works when an action is stolen? Lopens uncountered cop claim makes him look the most town of all parties involved but I dont follow Lopen saying hes convinced scum stole the result of his action but they would also believe his fake breadcrumbing of scanning Lea. If Lopen is telling the truth and hes right scum has the stealing ability, wouldnt they see he scanned red? Maybe I misunderstood something here.

Ironically, Corrik claims to be town who stole Lopens scan result on red. So while Im not sold on Isquen being scum, suddenly the randomness of Isquen claiming entirely unprompted and specifying he watched Lea does have an explanation, if town Corrik got the stolen result and therefore scum bought Lopens ploy to get in front of a scan on Lea?

Corrik seems the scummiest of all at a glance and it would be a helpful time for them to stop playing games. From his annoying one part is true post I infer he stole Lopens result and red is town.

I have to get to work but Im going to look back through it all when I can.