LogFAQs > #975246409

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Mods need to start cracking down on Pitbull topics
--Zero- 08/04/23 10:42:24 AM #35:	Jerry_Hellyeah posted... Says the genius saying that we should bring attention to a pitbull related issue.... ....but not the human death toll, no. The important part. The emotional toll on CEman. Ill respond seriously to you even if its not advised. Human death toll is unfortunately not the issue. Its the owners being irresponsible and that can never be debated against factually. AceAttorneyist posted... I don't necessarily care what the intention is is my point. Only that it brings awareness. So even if the intention is to troll youre okay with it because its a new story and brings awareness? Thats ridiculous lol. Master_Kazuya posted... Is it really that hard to mentally ignore the topics and go talk about something else? You see them every day so now and then yeah I got annoyed with it. Today in particular because a topic was made about dogs that were not pitbulls who mauled someone because the owner and while reading the topic it turned into a pitbull troll fest. So now dogs cant be talked about here without the usual suspects coming in to talk about their hate for pitbulls. ai123 posted... Owning, or liking putbulls, should not be protected. I might as well ask for it to be against board rules for people to say pop music is trash, or make fun of British food. Ridiculous. How are you going to handle a violent, overmuscled, psychotic dog, if you can't even handle people hating on them? Trolling should be targeted more for moderations when it gets to the obnoxious levels it has here. If people were constantly attacking pop music or British food and the intentions were to troll from the same people then yeah that is a problem. The difference is your examples are not directed at someones pet that they have an emotional bond with. --- Sig <cite>--Zero- posted [p:975246409] in Mods need ... [t:80527594]...</cite> <quote>Jerry_Hellyeah posted... </cite><quote>Says the genius saying that we should bring attention to a pitbull related issue........but not the human death toll, no.The important part. The emotional toll on CEman.</quote>Ill respond seriously to you even if its not advised. Human death toll is unfortunately not the issue. Its the owners being irresponsible and that can never be debated against factually.AceAttorneyist posted... </cite><quote>I don't necessarily care what the intention is is my point. Only that it brings awareness.</quote>So even if the intention is to troll youre okay with it because its a new story and brings awareness? Thats ridiculous lol.Master_Kazuya posted... </cite><quote>Is it really that hard to mentally ignore the topics and go talk about something else?</quote>You see them every day so now and then yeah I got annoyed with it. Today in particular because a topic was made about dogs that were not pitbulls who mauled someone because the owner and while reading the topic it turned into a pitbull troll fest. So now dogs cant be talked about here without the usual suspects coming in to talk about their hate for pitbulls.ai123 posted... </cite><quote>Owning, or liking putbulls, should not be protected.I might as well ask for it to be against board rules for people to say pop music is trash, or make fun of British food.Ridiculous. How are you going to handle a violent, overmuscled, psychotic dog, if you can't even handle people hating on them?</quote>Trolling should be targeted more for moderations when it gets to the obnoxious levels it has here. If people were constantly attacking pop music or British food and the intentions were to troll from the same people then yeah that is a problem. The difference is your examples are not directed at someones pet that they have an emotional bond with. --- Sig</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1