LogFAQs > #975255411

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do any of you here doubt the accuracy of radiocarbon or radiometric dating?
potdnewb 08/04/23 7:24:02 PM #7:	Whiterun_Guard_ posted... Who? Btw, carbon dating is only useful up until 60,000 years, it's half-life is 5,730 years, so after long it's not useful anymore. You would have to take issue with the concept of radioactive decay for some reason. And like, basic chemistry. But again, take an issue with basic widespread science, get laughed at. You're allowed to think that, you'd just be wrong. considering how much science has been proven wrong by more science its ok to have some doubt regarding science as truth <cite>potdnewb posted [p:975255411] in Do any of ... [t:80527891]...</cite> <quote>Whiterun_Guard_ posted... </cite><quote>Who?Btw, carbon dating is only useful up until 60,000 years, it's half-life is 5,730 years, so after long it's not useful anymore.You would have to take issue with the concept of radioactive decay for some reason. And like, basic chemistry. But again, take an issue with basic widespread science, get laughed at. You're allowed to think that, you'd just be wrong.</quote>considering how much science has been proven wrong by more science its ok to have some doubt regarding science as truth</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1