LogFAQs > #975256540

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do any of you here doubt the accuracy of radiocarbon or radiometric dating?
adjl 08/04/23 8:31:49 PM #25:	potdnewb posted... because there is the possibility it is wrong There's a possibility that everything is wrong. Doubting things specifically, though, should be based on finding a reason to doubt them. What is your reason? potdnewb posted... everything set in stone erodes And that's why radiometric dating works. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:975256540] in Do any of ... [t:80527891]...</cite> <quote>potdnewb posted... </cite><quote>because there is the possibility it is wrong</quote>There's a possibility that everything is wrong. Doubting things specifically, though, should be based on finding a reason to doubt them. What is your reason?potdnewb posted... </cite><quote>everything set in stone erodes</quote>And that's why radiometric dating works. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1