LogFAQs > #975853300

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	It's now illegal to block people on GameFAQs. See ya later
SirChris 09/04/23 11:20:47 AM #83:	Thorn posted... That specific rule in the post was definitely moddable back under the old moderation regime, but SBAllen explicitly relaxed the rules some years back - I know, because I was among a couple of people arguing it was a bad idea to him in the "request for comment"-esque thread he made announcing the plan and I clearly lost that fight - so it seems a little weird to me that that still qualifies as actionable. Still, if that's the position the mod took I'd at least understand it. It's the stated reasoning Emerald was given by the mod that floors me because that is in no way or shape the rules AFAIK. Ah, I missed the stated reason. That is dumb, classic gamefaqs mods lol --- Acknowledge Me "Yeah Chris is right." - Eddv, no context required. <cite>SirChris posted [p:975853300] in It's now i... [t:80555346]...</cite> <quote>Thorn posted... </cite><quote>That specific rule in the post was definitely moddable back under the old moderation regime, but SBAllen explicitly relaxed the rules some years back - I know, because I was among a couple of people arguing it was a bad idea to him in the "request for comment"-esque thread he made announcing the plan and I clearly lost that fight - so it seems a little weird to me that that still qualifies as actionable.Still, if that's the position the mod took I'd at least understand it. It's the stated reasoning Emerald was given by the mod that floors me because that is in no way or shape the rules AFAIK.</quote>Ah, I missed the stated reason. That is dumb, classic gamefaqs mods lol --- Acknowledge Me"Yeah Chris is right." - Eddv, no context required.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1