LogFAQs > #975904314

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicSup with women's pants not having adequate pockets, still?
ClayGuida
09/06/23 7:06:08 PM
#1:


Was having an alarmingly in depth conversation today about this, and literally blurted out Big Purse as a reason that it's 2023 and women are still being subjected to tiny ass pockets in pants/dresses, despite the ability to cram pockets on leggings, arguably the most form fitting pant out there, yet they can't simply put them in clothing? How is this still a thing? I knew about this issue in the 00's, and a little in the 10's, but kinda stopped hearing about it, especially with the big legging/yoga pant explosion in that decade, but listened to a comedy podcast today and June Diane still complaining about it alerted me to the idea that it's still a huge issue. Now she's rich, so maybe she's not shopping at Walmart for her pants, but I assume they're still struggling to fit a quality sized pocket on those pants.

So is it Big Purse that's stopping the innovation of adding a pocket to women's clothing? Is Louis Vuitton holding designers off balcony's to prevent women from not needing a purse anymore?

---
lolAmerica
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1