LogFAQs > #889104054

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDo you truly believe da Alt Right and Antifa are EQUALLY as bad?
gunplagirl
10/25/17 8:16:49 AM
#35:


Restrain posted...
gunplagirl posted...
Restrain posted...
gunplagirl posted...
m_mungmung posted...
Not equally, no. Unfortunately, this naturally pivots into what everyone seems to be falling for; the the enemy of my enemy is my friend crap in a universe where its possible to be too cold or too hot. Mind you, Germany in the 1930s or whatever elected the Nazis in because they were better than the communists. Communists are bad. Nazis are bad.

Nazis are bad. Antifa is bad. There is no false dichotomy here, its not one or the other, lesser of two evils crap. If you call yourself a law abiding citizen with the best interests in your community, then you wont settle for a society that accepts either of these evils.

Get rid of fascists like nazis and antifa won't exist anymore.

Get rid of how?

Like imprison them?
Kill them?

How do you propose to "get rid of" an entire idea? Hitler also tried to get rid of communists and we saw how that ended up.

And how did America treat the Nazis? There was an entire war. Killed Nazis left and right. To this day, will still pursue any former leader for war crimes. And Germany plus most of Europe in the time since has completely banned any sort of Nazi items or messages supporting them. That's how you get rid of them.

So you're proposing the mass slaughter of American citizens based on thought crimes...?

How does that not make you as bad as a Nazi?


So you completely missed the BANNED IN EUROPE part and how we still pursue the former leaders with world courts?

If they refuse to change then yes, imprison them. If it comes to it, they might need to be killed but only if they refuse to comply. As for the differences between them and I?

If somebody wants to destroy the kill others and their cohorts with similar views have a history of murder and they're armed, and they want to kill you. Would not you agree that wanting them stopped by any means, so they can't hurt anyone ever again, is more in line with self defense? They want to kill to create a white ethnostate. We only want to use violence to make them stop and if necessary, to keep them from ever recovering. If that means killing them (and that's exactly what blood or soil means) then we must do it to defend actual innocent people. We imprison people who are in the process of getting turned in to radical Islamists and who are amassing weapons. The same should be done against white nationalists who are very much radicalized and yet free speech allows them to publicly spout that they want to kill Jews and people of color and lgbt people.

But there's a simple reason why "death to infidels" and "death to minorities" don't illicit the same response. And it has everything to do with the fact that white Americans (aka the majority of the population) does benefit from white nationalism while almost no Americans benefit from radical Islamic views.
---
Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020
IGN: Vanessa
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1