LogFAQs > #890260359

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	All-Purpose Wrestling Topic 423: Smackdown vs BRAUUUUUN
SSJBKK20Vegito 11/12/17 5:05:35 PM #463:	ZeroSignal620 posted... 2000, not so much. WCW was an absolute shit show for about 95% of the year (the 5% otherwise being Steiner's world title run), so Mike Awesome bringing out different fat chicks every night wouldn't really be much worse than what we actually saw. 2001 had things going in a slightly better direction (Sid Vicious, Animal, and US Champion Rick Steiner excluded). The Cruiserweight division was about to look better than ever with them getting their own tag titles. Scott Steiner's run was at its peak with him mowing down Goldberg, Sid, Nash, DDP, Booker (though he returned near the end), and Sting. The biggest reason WCW truly went under in 2001 was Jamie Kellner and Time Network Cable. Also speaking of Mike Awesome, you'd be hard pressed to find someone from the Alliance stable that had a worse WWE run. Even Stasiak fared better. Also, I must emphasize that was like the dumbest reasonable idea (IE, not they started playing Chess for wrestling belts) I could come up with, and after I did I looked at it and just thought.... is this that much worse than what they did? Which I guess goes to show you how bad it really was... <cite>SSJBKK20Vegito posted [p:890260359] in All-Purpos... [t:75917058]...</cite> <quote><cite>ZeroSignal620 posted...</cite> <quote>2000, not so much. WCW was an absolute shit show for about 95% of the year (the 5% otherwise being Steiner's world title run), so Mike Awesome bringing out different fat chicks every night wouldn't really be much worse than what we actually saw. 2001 had things going in a slightly better direction (Sid Vicious, Animal, and US Champion Rick Steiner excluded). The Cruiserweight division was about to look better than ever with them getting their own tag titles. Scott Steiner's run was at its peak with him mowing down Goldberg, Sid, Nash, DDP, Booker (though he returned near the end), and Sting. The biggest reason WCW truly went under in 2001 was Jamie Kellner and Time Network Cable. Also speaking of Mike Awesome, you'd be hard pressed to find someone from the Alliance stable that had a worse WWE run. Even Stasiak fared better.</quote> Also, I must emphasize that was like the dumbest reasonable idea (IE, not they started playing Chess for wrestling belts) I could come up with, and after I did I looked at it and just thought.... is this that much worse than what they did? Which I guess goes to show you how bad it really was...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1