So people should go out of their way to attack the right in a topic that has nothing to do with them because otherwise it hurts your feelings? It's hilarious you're trying to claim he's throwing a hissy fit when you're literally getting all pissy for no reason
I didn't say he had to attack anyone. I was going to take the time to actually explain this to you, but it'd obviously fall on deaf ears So instead here's a smiley face :D
Esrac posted...
This is a topic in which the Left is trying to keep a documentary unwatched by the public. Bringing up the bad behavior of the Right would just be off-topic. When pointing put the bad behaviour of one group, we don't always have to talk about the bad behavior of their rival group.
Saying "the Left suppresses facts" is not saying "the Right is a beacon of truth". In fact, it is a statement that has nothing to do with the Right at all.
Saying "the left suppresses facts" does indeed imply that the right does not. Otherwise why make the distinction? If you're going to bother to make a distinction between right and left, you're quite obviously inferring that the opposite side does not follow suit. I mean this is just common sense. Plus, its very easy to simply agree that the specific subject at hand is dishonest and suppresses facts without indicting the entire left, which is also incorrect.
Do you guys seriously need this stuff explained to you?
No. Talking about a specific case of one group, in this case the Left, behaving badly makes no statement on another group, like the Right. We aren't talking about the two sides in general, we are talking about a specific case in which leftist transgender activists are working to have a documentary that questions the positions they advocate for kept out of the public eye.
Bringing up the bad behaviour of the Right is just playing a game of Whataboutism to deflect from the specific issue. ---