LogFAQs > #902016098

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	So why is not mildly inconveniencing gun owners such a high priority?
DifferentialEquation 05/26/18 12:04:51 PM #70:	YoungMutual posted... Dark_Spiret posted... because 1. you are effectively punishing 99.98% of the gun "community" for others fuckups. and 2. it never stops at mild regulations. These guys are some of the most selfish borderline evil people alive. The refuse to make even a single concession even if it means saving some lives. Fuck them and fuck their need to amass weapons. Let's heavily tax guns, America has shown that, as a collective they aren't fit for lax arms regulations/lax enforcement. YoungMutual posted... John_Galt posted... YoungMutual posted... Dark_Spiret posted... because 1. you are effectively punishing 99.98% of the gun "community" for others fuckups. and 2. it never stops at mild regulations. tax Nope "I refuse to give in even slightly even if it means schools around the world will keep getting targeted" People like you are evil as fuck, no sugar coating it. I'd be interested to hear from a moderator why my post generalizing liberals as being immoral and against law and order was against the ToS, but these ones are okay? How is generalizing gun owners as seflish and borderline evil, and even telling another specific user here that he's "evil as fuck" okay under the TOS when what I said wasn't? Could a moderator please clarify? I didn't see anything in the ToS that said these types of posts were okay as long as long you're not attacking people on the left, but I could have overlooked it. --- There's no business to be taxed. <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:902016098] in So why is ... [t:76642289]...</cite> <quote><cite>YoungMutual posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dark_Spiret posted...</cite> <quote>because 1. you are effectively punishing 99.98% of the gun "community" for others fuckups. and 2. it never stops at mild regulations.</quote> These guys are some of the most selfish borderline evil people alive. The refuse to make even a single concession even if it means saving some lives. Fuck them and fuck their need to amass weapons. Let's heavily tax guns, America has shown that, as a collective they aren't fit for lax arms regulations/lax enforcement.</quote> <cite>YoungMutual posted...</cite> <quote><cite>John_Galt posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YoungMutual posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dark_Spiret posted...</cite> <quote>because 1. you are effectively punishing 99.98% of the gun "community" for others fuckups. and 2. it never stops at mild regulations.</quote> tax</quote> Nope</quote> "I refuse to give in even slightly even if it means schools around the world will keep getting targeted" People like you are evil as fuck, no sugar coating it.</quote> I'd be interested to hear from a moderator why my post generalizing liberals as being immoral and against law and order was against the ToS, but these ones are okay? How is generalizing gun owners as seflish and borderline evil, and even telling another specific user here that he's "evil as fuck" okay under the TOS when what I said wasn't? Could a moderator please clarify? I didn't see anything in the ToS that said these types of posts were okay as long as long you're not attacking people on the left, but I could have overlooked it. --- There's no business to be taxed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1