LogFAQs > #902136195

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Battlefield 5 controversy is embarrassing for all sides
DarthAragorn 05/28/18 5:50:53 PM #9:	Hexenherz posted... DarthAragorn posted... JustAndrew88 posted... I have no outrage. I just don't like WW2 games. I prefer modern/futuristic tech. So I'll just be skipping this one based on that. Why didn't they just do a modern game It's been several years since BF4, and nobody else is doing a modern setting shooter that isn't battle royale or round based And they could have women with prosthetic arms in it and it would actually fit People have been looking forward to a 2142 sequel, too. And that BF4 expansion pack was the perfect bridge to "2143". 2143 would have been amazing too But no, we had to have a WW1 game that was just a reskin with no meaningful gameplay changes to fit the period, and now WW2 --- A thousand eyes, and one. <cite>DarthAragorn posted [p:902136195] in The Battle... [t:76651976]...</cite> <quote><cite>Hexenherz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarthAragorn posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>JustAndrew88 posted...</cite> <quote> I have no outrage. I just don't like WW2 games. I prefer modern/futuristic tech. So I'll just be skipping this one based on that. </quote> Why didn't they just do a modern game It's been several years since BF4, and nobody else is doing a modern setting shooter that isn't battle royale or round based And they could have women with prosthetic arms in it and it would actually fit</quote> People have been looking forward to a 2142 sequel, too. And that BF4 expansion pack was the perfect bridge to "2143".</quote> 2143 would have been amazing too But no, we had to have a WW1 game that was just a reskin with no meaningful gameplay changes to fit the period, and now WW2 --- A thousand eyes, and one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1