Current Events > The Battlefield 5 controversy is embarrassing for all sides

Topic List
Page List: 1
Doe
05/28/18 5:44:07 PM
#1:


All the dumbasses throwing a fit that the WW2 game isn't accurate enough to WW2 or whatever swallowed EA/DICE's bait hook line and singer. And because of their needless outrage there is also people vowing to support the game and spread good word about it for the same of women or whatever. The mindless consuming masses are once again played like the pieces they are
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn
05/28/18 5:44:45 PM
#2:


Nobody is gonna buy it just because women are in it
---
A thousand eyes, and one.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Reis
05/28/18 5:45:14 PM
#3:


Doe posted...
The mindless consuming masses are once again played like the pieces they are

I'm 16 and very deep yes
... Copied to Clipboard!
Doe
05/28/18 5:45:28 PM
#4:


DarthAragorn posted...
Nobody is gonna buy it just because women are in it

They will talk about it
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JustAndrew88
05/28/18 5:45:34 PM
#5:


I have no outrage. I just don't like WW2 games. I prefer modern/futuristic tech. So I'll just be skipping this one based on that.
---
You don't understand. Edgar is the one in the hole.
... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn
05/28/18 5:47:39 PM
#6:


JustAndrew88 posted...
I have no outrage. I just don't like WW2 games. I prefer modern/futuristic tech. So I'll just be skipping this one based on that.

Why didn't they just do a modern game

It's been several years since BF4, and nobody else is doing a modern setting shooter that isn't battle royale or round based

And they could have women with prosthetic arms in it and it would actually fit
---
A thousand eyes, and one.
... Copied to Clipboard!
JustAndrew88
05/28/18 5:48:39 PM
#7:


DarthAragorn posted...
JustAndrew88 posted...
I have no outrage. I just don't like WW2 games. I prefer modern/futuristic tech. So I'll just be skipping this one based on that.

Why didn't they just do a modern game

It's been several years since BF4, and nobody else is doing a modern setting shooter that isn't battle royale or round based

And they could have women with prosthetic arms in it and it would actually fit

That's pretty much what I expected. Pretty disappointed but no big deal. Maybe the next one will go back to that type of stuff.
---
You don't understand. Edgar is the one in the hole.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Hexenherz
05/28/18 5:49:36 PM
#8:


DarthAragorn posted...
JustAndrew88 posted...
I have no outrage. I just don't like WW2 games. I prefer modern/futuristic tech. So I'll just be skipping this one based on that.

Why didn't they just do a modern game

It's been several years since BF4, and nobody else is doing a modern setting shooter that isn't battle royale or round based

And they could have women with prosthetic arms in it and it would actually fit

People have been looking forward to a 2142 sequel, too. And that BF4 expansion pack was the perfect bridge to "2143".
---
RS3: UltimaSuende . 99 WC / 97/99 Fishing.
... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn
05/28/18 5:50:53 PM
#9:


Hexenherz posted...
DarthAragorn posted...
JustAndrew88 posted...
I have no outrage. I just don't like WW2 games. I prefer modern/futuristic tech. So I'll just be skipping this one based on that.

Why didn't they just do a modern game

It's been several years since BF4, and nobody else is doing a modern setting shooter that isn't battle royale or round based

And they could have women with prosthetic arms in it and it would actually fit

People have been looking forward to a 2142 sequel, too. And that BF4 expansion pack was the perfect bridge to "2143".

2143 would have been amazing too

But no, we had to have a WW1 game that was just a reskin with no meaningful gameplay changes to fit the period, and now WW2
---
A thousand eyes, and one.
... Copied to Clipboard!
#10
Post #10 was unavailable or deleted.
AvantgardeAClue
05/28/18 5:59:02 PM
#11:


I thought people were still tired of future warfare?

I wish Battlefield 4 wasn't so dead otherwise I'd probably still be playing it; remember that Battlefield 2 lasted 6 years before Battlefield 3, so they're not in a rush to constantly release new modern warfare games

Anyway, Battlefield 1 was a fresh breath and I hope BF5 is too for the WW2 genre
---
Sometimes I say things and I'm not voice acting.
... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn
05/28/18 6:00:41 PM
#12:


AvantgardeAClue posted...
I thought people were still tired of future warfare?

I wish Battlefield 4 wasn't so dead otherwise I'd probably still be playing it; remember that Battlefield 2 lasted 6 years before Battlefield 3, so they're not in a rush to constantly release new modern warfare games

Anyway, Battlefield 1 was a fresh breath and I hope BF5 is too for the WW2 genre

Future is fine, it's just that CoD future warfare is trash. Which is more to do with CoD itself than the setting. Titanfall 2 did it great.
---
A thousand eyes, and one.
... Copied to Clipboard!
AvantgardeAClue
05/28/18 6:04:11 PM
#13:


What's most annoying is the "REEE Bad Company 3" crowd

What would Bad Company 3 do any differently from the current Battlefield games besides the humor
---
Sometimes I say things and I'm not voice acting.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Hexenherz
05/28/18 6:07:43 PM
#14:


AvantgardeAClue posted...
I thought people were still tired of future warfare?

I wish Battlefield 4 wasn't so dead otherwise I'd probably still be playing it; remember that Battlefield 2 lasted 6 years before Battlefield 3, so they're not in a rush to constantly release new modern warfare games

Anyway, Battlefield 1 was a fresh breath and I hope BF5 is too for the WW2 genre


Battlefield hasn't done future warfare in like... five games, or 11 years.

Battlefield 1 was a beautiful game and there were some good ideas in there, but the gunplay was pretty bad and it really did feel like a SW Battlefront reskin.
---
RS3: UltimaSuende . 99 WC / 97/99 Fishing.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1