tl:dr - Man gets pulled over, refuses to let police search his vehicle, drug dog hits car, cops find marijuana. Cops get a warrant to search his phone because of marijuana charges, guy refuses to provide the password in court after judge rules that he must unlock his phone (says he can't remember the password). Judge finds the man in contempt of court which carries up to a 6 month sentence. Judge says he can go free as soon as he remembers the password.
Apparently, you can now be compelled to testify against yourself. What do you think CE?
Refusing a warranted search is not "refusing to testify against yourself."
Are you Dawkins or something
You have the right to remain silent. Pretty easy to understand.
Literally not the same thing as refusing or interfering with a search. ---