LogFAQs > #905202810

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do you believe a bad '3rd base' blackjack player negatively affects you overall?
Kazi1212 07/16/18 9:06:53 PM #13:	Capn Circus posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... Because the odds are in your favor if you play it by the book. Also because hitting 12+ against a 5/6 is beyond stupid and those people deserve to be hated, unless theyre just completely uneducated about the game. They get one pass in that instance. Yes, I understand that. You give yourself the best statistical chances at winning if you play by the book. What I'm saying is someone else not playing by the book doesn't affect my personal winnings in the long run. Ex: Bad player hits his 16 on dealer 6, gets a 10 and busts. Dealer ends up drawing a 6, and gets 22. The dealer would have busted regardless. The table won and only the bad player lost by not standing. The dealer would have busted regardless, but the probability he wouldve is less because the bad player hit on a dealer 6, at least thats how Im understanding it. By not hitting, the dealer would have potentially more cards to dodge that would bust him --- I don't know my gimmick "Does that sound reasonable to you?" <cite>Kazi1212 posted [p:905202810] in Do you bel... [t:76813656]...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Because the odds are in your favor if you play it by the book. Also because hitting 12+ against a 5/6 is beyond stupid and those people deserve to be hated, unless theyre just completely uneducated about the game. They get one pass in that instance.</quote> Yes, I understand that. You give yourself the best statistical chances at winning if you play by the book. What I'm saying is someone else not playing by the book doesn't affect my personal winnings in the long run. Ex: Bad player hits his 16 on dealer 6, gets a 10 and busts. Dealer ends up drawing a 6, and gets 22. The dealer would have busted regardless. The table won and only the bad player lost by not standing.</quote> The dealer would have busted regardless, but the probability he wouldve is less because the bad player hit on a dealer 6, at least thats how Im understanding it. By not hitting, the dealer would have potentially more cards to dodge that would bust him --- I don't know my gimmick "Does that sound reasonable to you?"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1