LogFAQs > #906304923

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Still can't believe the character assassination of James Damore actually worked.
nicklebro 08/05/18 11:53:07 AM #36:	MrToothHasYou posted... nicklebro posted... Do you know the details of his case? Whats there to know? He took some research about Big Five personality models and tried to infer that this research indicates that women arent biologically equipped to work in tech. He was wrong, he didnt understand the research, and he jumped to conclusions that didnt have any evidential support in the research literature he (without citing) based his critique on. He got fired for being a nonce, then tried to sue his former employer because hes a nonce. Oh so you don't understand or didn't read his memo at all, gotcha. Weird how he'd include ways of evening the gender divide if he believed women aren't biologically equipped to work in tech. If you don't understand sarcasm, its plainly obvious that you're simply regurgitating the character assassination that I was alluding to with this topic. Nowhere did he say women are incapable of working in tech. The fact that people like you are still fooled by such nonsense is why I made this topic, you'd think people would have actually done some research by now and realized their mistakes. But I guess you haven't. Btw, all of his research was cited, google removed the citations when they reposted his memo in an effort to trick people like you into buying their narrative. That's just one of the many ways you've been duped. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:906304923] in Still can'... [t:76872320]...</cite> <quote><cite>MrToothHasYou posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote>Do you know the details of his case?</quote> Whats there to know? He took some research about Big Five personality models and tried to infer that this research indicates that women arent biologically equipped to work in tech. He was wrong, he didnt understand the research, and he jumped to conclusions that didnt have any evidential support in the research literature he (without citing) based his critique on. He got fired for being a nonce, then tried to sue his former employer because hes a nonce.</quote> Oh so you don't understand or didn't read his memo at all, gotcha. Weird how he'd include ways of evening the gender divide if he believed women aren't biologically equipped to work in tech. If you don't understand sarcasm, its plainly obvious that you're simply regurgitating the character assassination that I was alluding to with this topic. Nowhere did he say women are incapable of working in tech. The fact that people like you are still fooled by such nonsense is why I made this topic, you'd think people would have actually done some research by now and realized their mistakes. But I guess you haven't. Btw, all of his research was cited, google removed the citations when they reposted his memo in an effort to trick people like you into buying their narrative. That's just one of the many ways you've been duped. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1