LogFAQs > #906603459

Dash_Harber posted...

But it's not a test to determine what you say it is. It doesn't test innate intelligence, which is pretty much impossible to measure. Dogs are also not a 1:1 comparison with humans. Also, importantly, breeds are not the same thing as races.

I didn't say it tested innate intelligence. Its an intelligence test and then you can look at the results across the different breeds and draw a conclusion. And again, this doesn't need to be perfect because I'm not arguing about the precision of the test, I'm drawing a conclusion based on a low density trends.
It doesn't matter if dogs are not 1:1 comparison, it doesn't matter if breeds are not races. The sole piece of information I'm drawing from these studies is that different breeds have varying levels of intelligence. And then I have to add that the fact that this tangent has taken over this thread is ridiculous. It isn't a integral part of my argument, even if you were to disprove it, my argument is not weakened and none of you have yet to actually make an argument.
---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.