LogFAQs > #909601025

Yeah, again, I never said it was objective. Maybe start dealing with what I actually said? Obviously this is just my opinion because I dislike them. Did I need to put an IMO in there somewhere to make that clear? It's confusing to have seen, over the years, the Bellas become normalized and accepted when they're basically as bad as they've always been, IMO.

HashtagSEP posted...

How is this not "I want this unrelated incident from a completely different person to morph into talking about how somebody else is bad" and how is this not an irrational response?

Because conversation "morphs" all the damn time? That's kind of how it works? Before I made my opening post here the conversation had already shifted from Brie's botch into a discussion about who was at fault for Paige's career-ending injury, and you yourself made this post:

I mean half of this topic defended Sasha when she went on a streak of almost killing herself and hurting other people in every other match so it's not really new

This completely changed the direction of the conversation and "morphed" it into something new, a Sasha thing rather than a Brie thing. Lopen then brought up the Paige incident, turning it into a Paige/Sasha thing rather than just a Sasha thing. You might say that it was natural to compare Sasha to Brie in this situation, and I don't disagree. But then I'd say that Nikki is a natural comparison/accompaniment to Brie, for obvious reasons.

You're acting like this is irrational when you've done the exact same thing in this very topic - "morphed a conversation into talking about how somebody else is bad". And there's nothing wrong with that! It was a fair comparison to make, the natural direction of the conversation. I'm just hoping that the conversation here becomes an anti-Nikki thing.

So you did the thing you are calling "irrational" in this topic, morphed a conversation into talking about someone else who was, at the time, unrelated. You obviously don't think that was an irrational thing to happen or to expect to happen, you likely thought it was a good comparison to make. So what separates us? Where does what I want to happen differ from what you have actually made happen just a few posts ago? Is the "irrational" part that I want discussion about Brie Bella to change in order to include discussion about Nikki Bella - but changing it to talk about Sasha is fine? So it's OK to bring up another, totally unrelated, wrestler who has botched a few times, but not OK to bring up her twin sister and tag-team partner and reality show(s) co-star?

Also, still waiting for examples of me being some anti-cynic and how this is hypocritical, because otherwise it's just a pretty unfair accusation lazily hurled around with nothing to back it up.
---

Not to be confused with XIII_Stones.