LogFAQs > #910346320

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Crewed Soyuz launch fails, crew survives, fate of ISS uncertain
Tyranthraxus 10/11/18 11:11:05 AM #8:	Minute posted... Tyranthraxus posted... Questionmarktarius posted... spudger posted... Rip science at least we have a president who cares about... oh wait The president advocated doubling down on space, and everyone mocked him for it. He advocated a nonsensical military branch. He did not advocate funding for scientists. I hate to take the side of Trump and @Questionmarktarius, but if Trump did get his fuckin monumentally stupid Space Force One dream, don't you think that would imply researching new spacecraft? Current space vehicle technology isn't exactly, you know, warfare-ready. I mean his monumentally stupid space force dream is so far removed from reality it's barely worth considering unless you're also going to consider shit like the Death Star. You're essentially asking here "If we have people in space whose job is to help with problems, wouldn't that help with people in space that have problems?" The issue is you have two problems now. 1. We want a Space Force 2. ISS is having some trouble 1 is a problem that we literally created for ourselves and 2 is a problem that wouldn't exist if we instead invested more in making sure that ISS and the shuttles that go to and from were less prone to errors. Suggesting that we solve problem 2 by creating a new problem--problem 1--and then solving that, and using problem 1's solution to also solve problem 2 is not only ridiculous, it's strictly a huge waste of resources spent on a problem that didn't exist until we created it. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:910346320] in Crewed Soy... [t:77087638]...</cite> <quote><cite>Minute posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>spudger posted...</cite> <quote>Rip science at least we have a president who cares about... oh wait</quote> The president advocated doubling down on space, and everyone mocked him for it.</quote> He advocated a nonsensical military branch. He did not advocate funding for scientists.</quote> I hate to take the side of Trump and @Questionmarktarius, but if Trump did get his fuckin monumentally stupid Space Force One dream, don't you think that would imply researching new spacecraft? Current space vehicle technology isn't exactly, you know, warfare-ready.</quote> I mean his monumentally stupid space force dream is so far removed from reality it's barely worth considering unless you're also going to consider shit like the Death Star. You're essentially asking here "If we have people in space whose job is to help with problems, wouldn't that help with people in space that have problems?" The issue is you have two problems now. 1. We want a Space Force 2. ISS is having some trouble 1 is a problem that we literally created for ourselves and 2 is a problem that wouldn't exist if we instead invested more in making sure that ISS and the shuttles that go to and from were less prone to errors. Suggesting that we solve problem 2 by creating a new problem--problem 1--and then solving that, and using problem 1's solution to also solve problem 2 is not only ridiculous, it's strictly a huge waste of resources spent on a problem that didn't exist until we created it. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1