LogFAQs > #911027649

Okay look, I know I am super scary. OK. I get that. But just ignore who is saying, and think about this. Does lynching someone who a component of their lynch being "they claimed their real scum role" make any sense to anyone? I know he has done other things that look really bad, I saw them too, but at a certain point isn't there just a little bit too much? Is there no room for the fact that we have misunderstood? The claim is so sick to come from scum. It's so sick. It should only take one beautifully town thing to disqualify someone from being lynched. The unforced, totally out there claim that would suggest that FD literally, with no pressure, claimed his scum role.

I have never, in my almost 20 years of playing mafia, seen that happen. Unforced to claim their own scum flavor where flavor split was obvious. Not forced error. Not panic. Just ... oh btw, I'm scum guys.

I think we're committing an unforced error by lynching FD here over Sbell. I think we have a choice. It's a toughie because FD is a silly boy, but it is a choice. What's to like about Sbell's game? Look at how we've argued today. I have beaten the shit out of him. Am I the only one who has an accurate score card ringside to the beating I've dished out? Am I just so caught up in myself that I don't realize I have made an erroneous argument?
---

Sir Chris