LogFAQs > #912504054

Zanzenburger posted...

This article is misleading as hell. From using "biological female" to refer to a transmale to saying that the guy is refusing to see a "potentially naked underage female", which, while true, is unlikely. Supervising a locker room doesn't mean just standing there watching the students change. It means being around in case of any issues or emergencies. And the transpeople I know are typically discreet when they change in locker rooms; they don't just flaunt themselves around naked. Besides, the way the article is worded implies that it's okay the PE teacher just sits around and watch underage boys naked, as long as they're boys.

With that being said, the school was pretty stupid to retaliate against the PE teacher for something like this. I feel like a better compromise could have been reached.

But that doesn't change the fact that this article used the most flowery wording possible to make this situation seem a lot worse than it is.

How is she not biologically female? And if theres one thing I know about middle schoolers, theyre all about using discretion.

Jesus...

I mean just fuck the comfort level of all the little boys right? Must bend to the will of one, to hell with the many.
---

Horses?! We can't afford t'lose no horses!