LogFAQs > #925048786

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Percent of men under 30 reporting no sex triples to record highs.
Twin3Turbo 07/22/19 9:04:19 PM #60:	Prismsblade posted... There certainly are, but woman are the main initiators of divoce by a landslide so out of the two genders it's clearly woman with more of a issue with it. Those career woman you see being validated constantly could find a man easily if they just lowed their standards, but they wont. Becuase woman due to biology or hypergamy specifically generally do not marry down. In regards to the divorce thing, money typically is one of the main factors, although I'm not so sure it's because she may be making more, but more because of the way money is spent/saved in the house, and the couples debt situation. I 100% agree about the women not marrying down point. I've even brought that up to my friends (and on this board in a somewhat recent post that IIRC Zanzeburger made about a couple of his successful friends using the "Men cant handle my success" excuse). It's why I don't feel sorry for a lot of successful celebrity women that we all know of that get cheated on constantly. Almost all of them could find a faithful husband, but they want to marry a guy that is equally successful or more. But the problem is that he has hot 10/10's constantly throwing themselves at him and history has shown that that's hard for most men to turn down. Prismsblade posted... I can see where people are coming from blaiming our traditional roles today on societal norms of old. But dont you think it's to much of a coincidence that gender roles have remained consistant throughout all of human history without any sorta huge debate or conflict? It just happaned. Regardless of our time period, religion, culture, place, or continent? Well that's also a point I'm making. The fact that women now are doing so well in comparison to men in addition to having it ingrained in them that a man is supposed to take care of them....those two factors lead to a lot of women being breadwinners, making more money than men, and not wanting to date guys that make less than them. Those guys making 40k today would have had less issues scooping up a woman back in the days where women didn't work or didn't make as much money. But now that women are making 60k, 70k and up, those 40k guys don't cut it for them any more. I agree that those women should probably be at least a little more open to the idea of marrying down, but chances are, they are going to at least feel like on some level that they are taking care of him. But they have it ingrained that it should be the other way around. --- https://imgur.com/PHWbltB <cite>Twin3Turbo posted [p:925048786] in Percent of... [t:77882141]...</cite> <quote><cite>Prismsblade posted...</cite> <quote>There certainly are, but woman are the main initiators of divoce by a landslide so out of the two genders it's clearly woman with more of a issue with it. Those career woman you see being validated constantly could find a man easily if they just lowed their standards, but they wont. Becuase woman due to biology or hypergamy specifically generally do not marry down.</quote> In regards to the divorce thing, money typically is one of the main factors, although I'm not so sure it's because she may be making more, but more because of the way money is spent/saved in the house, and the couples debt situation. I 100% agree about the women not marrying down point. I've even brought that up to my friends (and on this board in a somewhat recent post that IIRC Zanzeburger made about a couple of his successful friends using the "Men cant handle my success" excuse). It's why I don't feel sorry for a lot of successful celebrity women that we all know of that get cheated on constantly. Almost all of them could find a faithful husband, but they want to marry a guy that is equally successful or more. But the problem is that he has hot 10/10's constantly throwing themselves at him and history has shown that that's hard for most men to turn down. <cite>Prismsblade posted...</cite> <quote>I can see where people are coming from blaiming our traditional roles today on societal norms of old. But dont you think it's to much of a coincidence that gender roles have remained consistant throughout all of human history without any sorta huge debate or conflict? It just happaned. Regardless of our time period, religion, culture, place, or continent?</quote> Well that's also a point I'm making. The fact that women now are doing so well in comparison to men in addition to having it ingrained in them that a man is supposed to take care of them....those two factors lead to a lot of women being breadwinners, making more money than men, and not wanting to date guys that make less than them. Those guys making 40k today would have had less issues scooping up a woman back in the days where women didn't work or didn't make as much money. But now that women are making 60k, 70k and up, those 40k guys don't cut it for them any more. I agree that those women should probably be at least a little more open to the idea of marrying down, but chances are, they are going to at least feel like on some level that they are taking care of him. But they have it ingrained that it should be the other way around. --- https://imgur.com/PHWbltB</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1