LogFAQs > #928238965

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The future is bleak for major cities.
uwnim 10/02/19 2:13:29 PM #60:	pls posted... uwnim posted... If it is actually a bad idea due the the layout of the area, then it won't be built. Still people should be allowed to because restrictive zoning laws don't do anything except make development that people actually need harder. You'd literally have a zoning law for this exact purpose - to codify that building a skyscraper in some subdivision full of homes is a really fucking stupid idea. What makes it terrible exactly? Like say there was an area where it was logistically possible and the zoning was changed from single family homes only to any sort of residential and residential/commercial building, would there be a good and compelling reason to block a proposal for such a building? --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn. [Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica] <cite>uwnim posted [p:928238965] in The future... [t:78057851]...</cite> <quote>pls posted...</cite> <quote>uwnim posted...</cite> <quote>If it is actually a bad idea due the the layout of the area, then it won't be built. Still people should be allowed to because restrictive zoning laws don't do anything except make development that people actually need harder.</quote> You'd literally have a zoning law for this exact purpose - to codify that building a skyscraper in some subdivision full of homes is a really fucking stupid idea.</quote> What makes it terrible exactly? Like say there was an area where it was logistically possible and the zoning was changed from single family homes only to any sort of residential and residential/commercial building, would there be a good and compelling reason to block a proposal for such a building? --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn. [Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1