LogFAQs > #928255933

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Amber Guyger trial live (police shooting of man in his own home)
MelzezDoor 10/02/19 8:45:12 PM #382:	brandunh11 posted... MelzezDoor posted... You're not seriously suggesting you need to know someone to have a motive to kill? People have been killed for far less. Following the case not the topic but facts were they WERE neighbors. The rest is speculation but not baseless. No Im not suggesting that at all. I only mentioned that because you asked whether there was a prior conflict. The answer is no, and that answer is based on evidence from the trial. All other speculation is baseless. Again, read through the topic. Theres plenty here that detail what actually happened. Not sure why you're so against speculation. Nobody is trying to muddle facts or mislabel anyone. To say trial evidence accounts for everything that happened is tremendously lacking in foresight. Because there were no reports and she said so? I wanted to know possible reasons outside of what was mentioned that's all. And again, I am already following the case. How long are you going to tout the topic over other sources Twin3Turbo posted... Dude, the only motive we have (and quite frankly, need) is within the facts. She thought it was her apartment and went in guns blazing, expecting to take out the threat. Thats it. All we need? You're awfully opposed to the idea she might have had another reason. It's not like I claiming statements as fact metallica846 posted... Maybe he was always stamping around upstairs What I thought at first lol. Or something else that annoyed her and kept quiet. I mean deleting stuff probably means you're aware of what to hide. <cite>MelzezDoor posted [p:928255933] in Amber Guyg... [t:78035349]...</cite> <quote>brandunh11 posted...</cite> <quote>MelzezDoor posted... </cite> <quote>You're not seriously suggesting you need to know someone to have a motive to kill? People have been killed for far less. Following the case not the topic but facts were they WERE neighbors. The rest is speculation but not baseless.</quote> No Im not suggesting that at all. I only mentioned that because you asked whether there was a prior conflict. The answer is no, and that answer is based on evidence from the trial. All other speculation is baseless. Again, read through the topic. Theres plenty here that detail what actually happened. </quote> Not sure why you're so against speculation. Nobody is trying to muddle facts or mislabel anyone. To say trial evidence accounts for everything that happened is tremendously lacking in foresight. Because there were no reports and she said so? I wanted to know possible reasons outside of what was mentioned that's all. And again, I am already following the case. How long are you going to tout the topic over other sources Twin3Turbo posted...</cite> <quote>Dude, the only motive we have (and quite frankly, need) is within the facts. She thought it was her apartment and went in guns blazing, expecting to take out the threat. Thats it.</quote> All we need? You're awfully opposed to the idea she might have had another reason. It's not like I claiming statements as fact metallica846 posted...</cite> <quote>Maybe he was always stamping around upstairs</quote> What I thought at first lol. Or something else that annoyed her and kept quiet. I mean deleting stuff probably means you're aware of what to hide.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1